IHJ-34 - Khaki Chino Chore Jacket

[Cutlasshound]

Looks pretty killer to me

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[gratefulmelon]

Thanks man. The pictures don't do it justice. I'll post  better pics when finished.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[gratefulmelon]

I'm pretty pleased with how it turned out. Feels like a totally different jacket now.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[jdl1279]

Looks like you have some excess wax build up. If you want more even coverage, put the jacket in an old bag you can close up and toss it in the dryer for about 20 minutes. Pull it while still hot, hang it up, pull it straight and let cool

[Dstauffer]

@gratefulmelon that looks sick! I undertook the same project with an LC King chore jacket I had and I love the character it adds. Be prepared for compliments

Cheers!

[gratefulmelon]

Thanks for the comments and advice. I saw a video online about the dryer thing. Probably try that tonight.

[steelworker]

That looks good @gratefulmelon !

[rocket]

[rocket]

[Cutlasshound]

Great combo good sir!

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[rocket]

Cheers mate!

[rocket]

[Anesthetist]

Rocket is on [emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji91]

Incidentally, I always thought this jacket was a little too heritage for my liking but you really show how versatile this piece is.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[hairydangler]

I enjoyed all @rocket posted photos today. He posted awesome fit pics in nearly every product thread IH has. Haha. He owns one of everything it seems and looks great in all of it. I always get good ideas from his combos. Thanks rocket. Well done!

Edit I think I'll throw this post in the random love thread also.

[rocket]

Cheers @daltmeyer just some randoms from the last weeks

Know what you mean @Anesthetist and it def have this vibe but works

[Aetas]

@Giles said in IHJ-34 - Khaki Chino Chore Jacket:

IHJ-34 - Khaki Chino Chore Jacket

Shuttle loom woven chino cloth.
USD325
Also available in navy blue

This shuttle loom woven chino cloth is underrated.

[tody]

why am i not surprised to see who revived this thread?