The (Less intimidating) Watch Thread
-
@neph93 if you're a regular reader of Hodinkee, anything over 38 mm, or even 36 mm, is considered an oversized vulgarity, and the watch should be made in a smaller size.
OK, more seriously, don't sweat it. The important thing is that the lugs don't project beyond your wrist. You lift, and you've got a decent set of arms on you, so you could go bigger if you want.
My opinion, which I've repeated regularly, is that you'll get used to a watch of a given size pretty quickly. If you normally wear a 44 mm one, then a Hodinkee-friendly 36 mm will look undersized for the first few days, and vice-versa.
If you're looking for an all-round piece, I'd probably suggest around 40 mm, which is a typical man's size these days, and should fit under cuffs. But if that 50 mm clock looks really good on you, then go for it. (I've got a soft spot for things that have character, and don't give a feck. I like the IWC Big Pilot's Heritage 48 and Panerai Mare Nostrum - pics on the other thread - which are yuge!)
-
The other thing to consider is how high the watch is on your wrist. This is a function of (doh!) the height of the watch's case but also how the lugs are integrated into the case. It matters because watches that are high and have steep "walls" might not fit as easily under a shirt, especially a dress shirt.
-
38mm Chris Ward Vintage trident pro.
Very glad I went for the smaller of the two sizes.
These go on sale a few times a year and I really like the style.That IH Pinion watch is a stunner!
Sent from my SM-G935P using Tapatalk
-
Something to remember when debating watch sizes- do not go by people's wrist shots to gauge how a watch will look in real life. They always look bigger in pics (that's what she said!). Whenever possible, try them on. If not possible, go to a watch store and try on a variety of sizes and styles, so that when you see something online and read that it's a 44mm cushion case, you have an idea what that will translate to on your wrist.
That said, I think watches in the 40-42mm range work well on pretty much anyone.
-
38mm absolutely is a doable size.
Besides, I thought you'd learned by now to ignore me…
-
maybe this might be helpful for folks trying to figure out what size watch they are comfortable with
it helped me and confirm I am a girly man who likes smaller watches to match my small donald trump hands
-
Like others have said it's all going to depend on personal comfort and wrist size, but I prefer 42-48mm range. Too small is too feminine IMO and too large is just…too large lol. There's been a trend in the past several years of huge watch faces on men and it gets a little ridiculous sometimes.
-
I'm still at a loss to understand what a dive watch really is. I dive with my Pinion. It's waterproof to the depths I dive (65 Meters - 210' max), I can read it easily and have no need for a bezel (not sure what to do with one and I have dived seriously for 20 years)….
I suspect you say that tongue-in-cheek. As we all know, no one needs a watch to dive anymore, with the modern computers. Dive watches are the watches that have functions that were required of them when watches were an indispensable part of a diver's equipment, before computers. I learned to dive in 86 or so, and for the ~10 years after that dive computers (and BCDs by the way) were first inexistent and then very expensive and very rare. The divemasters had to rely on tables and time their dive at depth as precisely as possible, and for that a 1-way rotating bezel is very effective.
As for the waterproof rating, it's a fairly abstract number. It's completely possible to flood a watch at a lower depth than it's rated for, depending on circumstances. Hopefully it's less likely to happen for a 300m rated watch than a 100m watch.
I agree that nowadays, no diver needs a diving watch. Similarly, pilots don't need pilots' watches, athletes don't need a racing watch, yachtmen don't need yachting watches, doctors don't need doctors' watches, etc. All those cover sets of features that are not needed anymore for their intended use.
-
Fair enough.
Personally I like diving watches because I have that connection with diving (although I don't rely on a watch for this) but also because I like the design and the fact that they're typically fairly rugged watches. They fit my tastes and lifestyle better than dress watch, chronos, and the like.
With this said, many of the "dive watches" are poorly designed for their original use. The bezel on my Seamaster (the blue James Bond model) has no sharp knurling, just a very smooth scalloping. It is hard to rotate when dry and would be impossible to do when wet, nevermind with gloves.
Dedicated watches are really an anachronism nowadays, ironically enough.
-
maybe this might be helpful for folks trying to figure out what size watch they are comfortable with
Thanks for that Mike. Helpful.
-
I really don't feel like watches are an anachronism. It's not always convenient or wise to yank out your smartphone to check the time. 1. it can be seen as being rude 2. you can't always reach into your pocket 3. it gives you a chance to drop your phone 4. it's not always wise to light up your surroundings (I'm thinking the movie theatre)
Re: sizes. One thing most people don't realize about dive watches is the face and legibility is not as good as compared to a field watch of the same size. A field watch of the same size has a much larger face and is easier to read on the fly than a dive watch with the same diameter.
