IH-824-BLK - 21oz Black Wabash Single Knee Logger Jeans

[Giles]

More or less…...It ain't modern.....

[neph93]

I hate that I say this for nearly every new product… but they look fantastic [emoji51]. Want.

[Madame Buttonfly]

NOW LIVE

[tvenuto]

Ordered

[EJS]

Guessing these will stretch in the waist like denim tends to?

[Giles]

It's a denim which is a twill weave, so yes…..

[tvenuto]

Just came in the mail. F-ing amazing pair of pants. Future under the radar classic for sure, don’t sleep on these, gents. Pics tomorrow.

[Appfaff]

Please do!

Is this 21oz Wabash LFT like the 12oz?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[tvenuto]

LFT?  Best I can do at the moment. With Taylor Stitch tiburon Oxford and danners. Like the fit, even more comfortable off the bat than my 1955S (my only basis for comparison) so very excited to see how they break in. I’ll try and get a full length shot today, I know how unhelpful this one is for folks on the fence.

[Appfaff]

Looks like a great fit - would DefinTely love to see one of your standing to see how they drape compared to Giles  pair!

LHT - “left hand twill”

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[tvenuto]

Some homage shots. I hemmed to 33, prob could have gone 32 but I don’t mind some stacks and hate to show leg when I sit. I also always plan for some shrinking in the length. If there’s any it’s gonna be there.

[sabergirl]

Those look great. Too many pants, not enough legs…

[neph93]

@tvenuto:

Some homage shots. I hemmed to 33, prob could have gone 32 but I don’t mind some stacks and hate to show leg when I sit. I also always plan for some shrinking in the length. If there’s any it’s gonna be there.

Great fit. Probably a good plan to go with the extra length. The 12oz wabash shrinks in the wash, incrementally, I suspect this will too.

[JDelage]

The cut … is like a 1955S with a low front rise and less tapper.

[Giles]

Both the 12oz and the 21oz are right hand twill…...

[Giles]

@JDelage:

The cut … is like a 1955S with a low front rise and less tapper.

More like a roomy 634S.  You know you can run a compare on the website:

https://screencast.com/t/loreSpsHOKZ

[chubacca]

@tvenuto:

Some homage shots. I hemmed to 33, prob could have gone 32 but I don’t mind some stacks and hate to show leg when I sit. I also always plan for some shrinking in the length. If there’s any it’s gonna be there.

How do you like the fit? I'm used to regular/slim taper and scared that this would be way too roomy

[tvenuto]

@chubacca  Personally, I do.  However, I generally I prefer a "relaxed" fit and assiduously avoid anything described as "slim" or "skinny."  My only other IH pants are the 1955S, because until recently they were the only ones where the thighs were big enough at my waist measurement.  I bought the brown whipchord work pants, but they were too snug in the top block, even though the thigh was workable.

I wouldn't object to a bit more taper from the knee down on these, but I like them as they are.  As Giles said, they are a roomier 634, so if you like something with a taper and something slim, these are pretty much the opposite.  They are amazing, though.

[JDelage]

I’m liking those. The cut is comfortable and the pattern gives them a badass, Swearengen-ish feel.

[tvenuto]

Very nice. People are gonna be sad they slept on these