Random questions to which you seek an answer

[Giles]

Mine is the 666, H's is the 634…..

[Matty123]

Hello @Giles. will IH ever do another run of the 634SR? thanks

[Giles]

No plans.  We have enough denim to run another 360 jeans, but sales of the UHR and SR really slowed down, so I'm not sure what we will do with the fabric….

[Dion]

How about a UHR Type III jacket?

[Giles]

Not physically possible to make in any sensible quantities…..

[Dion]

Dammit. The new cut has my vote then.

[Matty123]

I am really stumped. i just cant decide which model of IH jeans to buy next. i have the 634s and had them tapered at rail car. they are easily the best pair of jeans Ive ever had. now i cant decide between the
666S
666SII
634SII
301S

I know this is a champagne problem but a problem none the less. input? thanks.

[neph93]

How do you feel about low rises and a relaxed top block? If the answer to either of these questions is "icky" then stay away from the 301S.

I've worn the 666SII and they are brilliant. I'd go for them. Different cut, new denim.

[DrBabyhorse]

@Matty123:

I am really stumped. i just cant decide which model of IH jeans to buy next. i have the 634s and had them tapered at rail car. they are easily the best pair of jeans Ive ever had. now i cant decide between the
666S
666SII
634SII
301S

I know this is a champagne problem but a problem none the less. input? thanks.

Maybe wait it out for the new cut. Especially if you prefer a tapered 634.

Enviado desde mi iPhone utilizando Tapatalk

[Matty123]

Maybe wait it out for the new cut. Especially if you prefer a tapered 634.

Enviado desde mi iPhone utilizando Tapatalk

whats this new cut of which you speak?

[Matty123]

@neph93:

How do you feel about low rises and a relaxed top block? If the answer to either of these questions is "icky" then stay away from the 301S.

I've worn the 666SII and they are brilliant. I'd go for them. Different cut, new denim.

i dont mind a low rise. are you saying the top block is not relaxed? I'm leaning towards the 666sII or the 666s. this is harder than it ought to be. thanks for the input

[Jett129]

I went to the 555s after my initial 634s and they ended up becoming my favorite cut. If you want something really cool and interesting,and you can afford it,I'd recommend the Iron Heart/Pronto Denim double Indigo 25OZ Jean in the tapered cut.

[DrBabyhorse]

@Matty123:

Maybe wait it out for the new cut. Especially if you prefer a tapered 634.

Enviado desde mi iPhone utilizando Tapatalk

whats this new cut of which you speak?

Time For a New Jeans Cut….

https://r.tapatalk.com/shareLink?share_fid=19230&share_tid=9693&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ironheart.co.uk%2Fforum%2Findex.php%3Ftopic%3D9693&share_type=t

EDIT: apparently I can't send the link from tapatalk. Can anybody help out?

Enviado desde mi iPhone utilizando Tapatalk

[neph93]

@Matty123:

@neph93:

How do you feel about low rises and a relaxed top block? If the answer to either of these questions is "icky" then stay away from the 301S.

I've worn the 666SII and they are brilliant. I'd go for them. Different cut, new denim.

i dont mind a low rise. are you saying the top block is not relaxed? I'm leaning towards the 666sII or the 666s. this is harder than it ought to be. thanks for the input

Here's the link to the new cut thread:

https://www.ironheart.co.uk/forum/index.php?topic=9693.new;topicseen#new

The 301s has both a low rise and a loose top block. If that is your thing then cool, I know some people were turned off by these things.

[Megatron1505]

@Matty123 wait for the new cut, trust me 

[Matty123]

Thanks fellas. You're all aces. Will this new cut be in multiple denims? Or am I thinking to far ahead? Thanks mates

[neph93]

Standard 21oz to start with. More if it sells.

[Giles]

I suspect I have never before seen such a bunch of misquoted posts in my life..

[Matty123]

@Giles:

I suspect I have never before seen such a bunch of misquoted posts in my life..

Haha! @Giles  That's awesome. I suppose then I can't believe a thing I just read?

[neph93]

^ I think G was referring to the bad formatting, rather than the content.