• Home
    • Recent
    • Calendar
    • Register
    • Login
    Iron Heart Forum
    Iron Heart Forum

    Iron Heart Fall/Winter 2025 Collection Preview - Now Live

    Time For a New Jeans Cut….

    Future and Planned Products
    69
    465
    82.4k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • spitfiredealerS
      spitfiredealer
      Raw and Unwashed
      Joined:

      I am super excited for these too. Really hope they turn out well.

      last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • manufc10M
        manufc10
        Iron Heart Deity
        Joined:

        Yep, same here.  Looking forward to these.

        last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • spitfiredealerS
          spitfiredealer
          Raw and Unwashed
          Joined:

          I was hoping these might come in a different denim first but understand why the 21oz gets the nod. Lets hope they sell well and we get to see this cut in a range of denim

          last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • GilesG
            Giles
            IHUK Crew
            Joined:

            It will and they will….

            "OK face up to it - you're useless but generally pretty honest and straightforward . . . it's a rare combination of qualities that I have come to admire in you" - Geo 2011

            last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • neph93N
              neph93
              見習いボス
              Joined:

              @spitfiredealer:

              I was hoping these might come in a different denim first but understand why the 21oz gets the nod…

              I'm in the fortunate position of needing some fresh 21oz in my life. I've now gone through the first IH life cycle with my first pair ( 301S) bought 3 yrs ago having been trashed and my second pair (555-01) having reached well worn status. New 21oz for my summer pair (fingers crossed they land before summer) will be perfect.

              «Stevie Heighway on the wing!
              We had dreams, and songs to sing…»

              • Dame Vera Lynn
              last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • GilesG
                Giles
                IHUK Crew
                Joined:

                Unlikely…..Production runs I am committing to at the moment are going to be released in June, and I have not yet seen the sample of these.....

                "OK face up to it - you're useless but generally pretty honest and straightforward . . . it's a rare combination of qualities that I have come to admire in you" - Geo 2011

                last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • neph93N
                  neph93
                  見習いボス
                  Joined:

                  @Giles:

                  Unlikely…..

                  Never mind. They'll get here. Looking forward to finding out more details with regards lot###, patch etc…

                  «Stevie Heighway on the wing!
                  We had dreams, and songs to sing…»

                  • Dame Vera Lynn
                  last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • spitfiredealerS
                    spitfiredealer
                    Raw and Unwashed
                    Joined:

                    @neph93:

                    @spitfiredealer:

                    I was hoping these might come in a different denim first but understand why the 21oz gets the nod…

                    I'm in the fortunate position of needing some fresh 21oz in my life. I've now gone through the first IH life cycle with my first pair ( 301S) bought 3 yrs ago having been trashed and my second pair (555-01) having reached well worn status. New 21oz for my summer pair (fingers crossed they land before summer) will be perfect.

                    See i am the opposite, i got 2 pairs of 21oz which are still quite fresh. That being said neither of them are standard 21oz so maybe i do need another pair  😃

                    last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • R
                      richardjohn22
                      Joined:

                      @BULLITT:

                      I'm quietly hoping the thighs are more akin to the 1955 than the 634  😶

                      I'm reading through this thread while crossing my fingers and hoping for the exact same thing…

                      Edit: there's actually less in it than I thought there was... keep up the good work 😁

                      Oh, and make sure the pockets are deeper than the ones in the 1955S, please, they're too shallow for larger phones, and even with a little phone there were problems such as it being impossible to do up shoe laces unless you removed the phone from the pocket. (That issue more due to the extreme front rise/shallow pocket combo)Cheers!

                      last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • tvenutoT
                        tvenuto
                        Raw and Unwashed
                        Joined:

                        @richardjohn22 I've found the exact same thing with my 1955S.  I can't sit in the car with my iPhone in my pocket, and I don't even have a particularly large/new one.  I usually put it in my back pocket to walk around, and in a chest pocket when I'm in the car.  The result being I do an excessive amount of phone manipulations that I wish I didn't have to do throughout the day.  Other than that and the rise, the 1955s are pretty much perfect.

                        So long story short, a lower rise deeper pocketed 1955s would be my ideal cut.

                        last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • GilesG
                          Giles
                          IHUK Crew
                          Joined:

                          @richardjohn22:

                          Oh, and make sure the pockets are deeper than the ones in the 1955S, please, they're too shallow for larger phones, and even with a little phone there were problems such as it being impossible to do up shoe laces unless you removed the phone from the pocket. (That issue more due to the extreme front rise/shallow pocket combo)Cheers!

                          Pocket shape/size will be determined by what Haraki thinks is best, not and what the current 'on-trend" size is for a phone….

                          "OK face up to it - you're useless but generally pretty honest and straightforward . . . it's a rare combination of qualities that I have come to admire in you" - Geo 2011

                          last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • R
                            richardjohn22
                            Joined:

                            @Giles:

                            @richardjohn22:

                            Oh, and make sure the pockets are deeper than the ones in the 1955S, please, they're too shallow for larger phones, and even with a little phone there were problems such as it being impossible to do up shoe laces unless you removed the phone from the pocket. (That issue more due to the extreme front rise/shallow pocket combo)Cheers!

                            Pocket shape/size will be determined by what Haraki thinks is best, not and what the current 'on-trend" size is for a phone….

                            It's his baby, of course he can do what he wishes. It's best we provide you feedback when a functional component like a pocket is proving problematic, so you're aware it is an issue for some of us. Agree or disagree with the sentiment, just throwing it out there. It's an issue unique to the 1955S- never had a problem with any other pair from any other brand. Credit where credit is due, the pockets are better constructed and made from better fabric than any others I have seen, they're just shallow is all.

                            last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • R
                              richardjohn22
                              Joined:

                              @tvenuto:

                              @richardjohn22 I've found the exact same thing with my 1955S.  I can't sit in the car with my iPhone in my pocket, and I don't even have a particularly large/new one.  I usually put it in my back pocket to walk around, and in a chest pocket when I'm in the car.  The result being I do an excessive amount of phone manipulations that I wish I didn't have to do throughout the day.  Other than that and the rise, the 1955s are pretty much perfect.

                              So long story short, a lower rise deeper pocketed 1955s would be my ideal cut.

                              Snap.

                              I only have an iPhone 6SE, basically the smallest smartphone anyone will own, and if that doesn't fit comfortably… cant really see how that's a weird thing to want in a pocket?

                              But the front rise is much lower on these so at least that'll help compared to the 1955S.

                              last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • NomadN
                                Nomad
                                Raw and Unwashed
                                Joined:

                                Meh. Never put my phone in my jeans pocket, don't go much on the phone fade look.

                                Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

                                last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • neph93N
                                  neph93
                                  見習いボス
                                  Joined:

                                  @Nomad:

                                  Meh. Never put my phone in my jeans pocket, don't go much on the phone fade look.

                                  This. Also, it's 2017 and men can carry bags for their shit now.

                                  «Stevie Heighway on the wing!
                                  We had dreams, and songs to sing…»

                                  • Dame Vera Lynn
                                  last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • tvenutoT
                                    tvenuto
                                    Raw and Unwashed
                                    Joined:

                                    Can == must. Options are good. I would like my left front pocket to be one option. It's not the end of the world if not, but it will affect my buying decision. (I really do think a lower rise will solve this inherently absent any other changes)

                                    last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • R
                                      richardjohn22
                                      Joined:

                                      @tvenuto:

                                      Can == must. Options are good. I would like my left front pocket to be one option. It's not the end of the world if not, but it will affect my buying decision. (I really do think a lower rise will solve this inherently absent any other changes)

                                      I think you're right, a lower rise would single handedly solve the phone-in-pocket issue of the 1955S. In 36 the rise is 13.5, opposed to the regular 11 you'd see elsewhere. Plus the pocket when measured against all my other jeans (yes, I measured  😞 I was confused by my problem of failing to reach my feet with phone in pocket, despite thighs not being restricted) was almost exactly 1 inch shallower. If this new pair we're discussing is 12 in the front rise (which is a perfect measurement), and pockets matched the 1955S, then likely it would retain the phone-problem).

                                      And no, I'm not buying a man bag, and no, it's not a deal breaker that'll stop me buying this new pair, but it would see me unfortunately resigned to finding someone who could enlarge the pockets as I'll be moving to a phone which isn't so small.

                                      Also not putting the phone in my back pocket- anyone that does that in a big city deserves to have it stolen!  😃

                                      last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • GilesG
                                        Giles
                                        IHUK Crew
                                        Joined:

                                        @richardjohn22:

                                        I think you're right, a lower rise would single handedly solve the phone-in-pocket issue of the 1955S. In 36 the rise is 13.5, opposed to the regular 11 you'd see elsewhere.

                                        Richard, that is the point.  These are our take on a 1955 Levi's 501.  They have an unashamedly large rise because that is what a 1955 501 had…..

                                        "OK face up to it - you're useless but generally pretty honest and straightforward . . . it's a rare combination of qualities that I have come to admire in you" - Geo 2011

                                        last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • tvenutoT
                                          tvenuto
                                          Raw and Unwashed
                                          Joined:

                                          Totally understand. The thing is that the 1955s solves one issue (thigh to waist ratio) for some of us, and yet the high rise causes another. It may not be designed to solve that issue but it does. As such it gets bought by people with a certain build, and the rise is just something to deal with.

                                          Those of us blessed with the quads of Zeus himself are hoping this cut might solve our issue without the drawback that the 1955 has.  I'm sill going to wear my 1955s until they fall off my legs, but will always welcome a cut that could suit me better.

                                          It's hard to differentiate helpful feedback from petulant demands on the internet, but I'm pretty sure the comments here were intended as the former.

                                          last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • GilesG
                                            Giles
                                            IHUK Crew
                                            Joined:

                                            I am sure they were and I have no issue with that.  But the 1955 cut is a 1955 501 cut.  I don't want to change it, otherwise it is not a 1955 cut which is what I wanted it to be.  It's for those of us/you who like a larger rise and larger thighs.  If you don't like it, then there are a load of other options….

                                            Unfortunately, we and/or our cuts can't be all things for all men.

                                            I have taken a lot of feedback re: the new cut and I have submitted my requirements to H.  A sample will be made in due course, if I thinks it's shite or does not meet my specs, I'll change it, otherwise it will stay as is.

                                            "OK face up to it - you're useless but generally pretty honest and straightforward . . . it's a rare combination of qualities that I have come to admire in you" - Geo 2011

                                            last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Copyright Iron Heart 2025.