We know you love IH, but where do you think we can improve?
-
You can waive signature with UPS. Just tell us when you place the order (in the comments field).
This is what we say in FAQ's…
Because of the high value of our goods, our default is to send your order with the requirement for a signature on delivery. We can waive the signature requirement, at your own risk.
Instances of non-delivery are very rare, but if you request that signature on delivery be waived and the package goes missing after arrival at your local depot we will not accept responsibility for the lost goods.
-
You can waive signature with UPS. Just tell us when you the order (in the comments field).
This is what we say in FAQ's…
Because of the high value of our goods, our default is to send your order with the requirement for a signature on delivery. We can waive the signature requirement, at your own risk.
Instances of non-delivery are very rare, but if you request that signature on delivery be waived and the package goes missing after arrival at your local depot we will not accept responsibility for the lost goods.
Aha, ok I didn't know this. Thanks for that info I will keep that in mind on my next order.
-
can you look at listing the sizes with alternate waist measurement methods? when the front and rear rises differ substantially, the IH way of measuring the waist can create some unexpected dimensions
if you imagine a cylinder or tube cut at an angle (which is similar to the difference between the front & rear rise), the steeper the angle, the longer/bigger the IH way of waist measurement will make the waist dimension
-
I would like inner wrist buttons on shits (especially work shirts). I don't wear a watch and like mine tight, but might be in the minority…
-
So here's a challenge.
I'll give USD200 in gift vouchers for the first person who can do that using the IH-634S as the reference cut.
It's gone now. But I thought you had that here: http://www.ironheart.co.uk/forum/index.php?topic=8647.msg446117#msg446117
-
If you show me the url for this ' jeans styles' I can take a crack at it. I could at least arrange the cuts from slimmest to most roomy.
-
That's a good idea (and we can do a side shot of the 1955 no probs). I was thinking of creating an accurate outline image of 634 with actual waist of (lets say) 33 and then doing the same with 555, 777, IHXB01, 1955, 461, 666 etc and then having the facility to overlay any on any…..
-
They way I'm imagining it is more like a diagram where the outline of the 634s (I'm thinking like an image of the 634s folded lengthwise) is the basis, and then you illustrate the contours of the other pairs within that outline, so you can see how drastic the difference is in the rise, thigh, knee and taper.
I can take a shot at this, but I'm a hand-drawn type, so y'all with computer programs might be better suited to get it done quicker…
-
Of course Giles gets there first while I'm typing my post
-
I was thinking a pattern looking blueprint kind of overlay would be cool.
-
Over to whoever wants USD200
But I am thinking having the "portfolio" of pics as @TaBLemann suggests supported by hard and fast empirical data (in the form of diagrams), will do the the job admirably….
-
Nice ideas. Especially because it can be pretty subtle to gauge differences in rise from the pictures.
Here's a real futuristic idea, bear with me:As has been said, there's a wire-frame diagram per cut, each has its own color to help distinguish between them. You have a set of buttons, somewhat like the ones that help narrow down the options for cut and weight when you browse the jeans section of the site. So there's like a blank "blueprint" of some legs. You click on the button for 555, for example, and it toggles on and off the wireframe of that cut. Thus, you can turn a specific two on or off if you want to see an overlaid comparison.
THEN, it's programmed so the power cable on your computer automatically wraps around specific parts of your body at the right measurement for a selected size, so as to give you an impression of what that would feel like.
