• Home
    • Recent
    • Calendar
    • Register
    • Login
    Iron Heart Forum
    Iron Heart Forum

    Iron Heart Fall/Winter 2025 Collection Preview - Now Live

    Time For a New Jeans Cut….

    Future and Planned Products
    69
    465
    82.4k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • GilesG
      Giles
      IHUK Crew
      Joined:

      It'll depend on tag size.  I'm hoping for an inch on the smaller tag sizes and more than that on the larger tag sizes, but it is completely dependent upon what can be achieved given the constraints I articulated above.  For that, I need Tom-sans help…..

      "OK face up to it - you're useless but generally pretty honest and straightforward . . . it's a rare combination of qualities that I have come to admire in you" - Geo 2011

      last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • pillowPANTSP
        pillowPANTS
        Joined:

        This sounds awesome!! Thanks G&G music factory [emoji23]

        last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • Max PowerM
          Max Power
          Raw and Unwashed
          Joined:

          One of my IMO best fits was the 634SB in size 32, which had a leg opening of around 8,5". Sadly I need to size up to 34-36 these days, but just for the thighs and waist, making the rest of the leg look way to wide. So, I would be totally happy with a leg opening that is around 1" smaller than the current 634 offers. A carrot fit that tapers heavily like the FH 3012 looks somewhat off.

          @elclintor:

          > I don't care what people say.. The Max Power way is the right way…

          last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • neph93N
            neph93
            見習いボス
            Joined:

            ^ agreed.

            “Some of those that work forces
            Are the same that burn crosses”

            • Virginia Woolf
            last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • spitfiredealerS
              spitfiredealer
              Raw and Unwashed
              Joined:

              I just got the 634SB in a 32 Max. They are currently being hemmed and tapered to a 8" hem. Had the knee taken in a little too. I find the wider knee adds to the flair of the lower leg no matter what the hem is.

              last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • hajdukH
                hajduk
                啓蒙家
                Joined:

                The 634SV pattern was a quasi perfect one. Rise…tighs...hem...with a classic minus 0,6" from the knee meas. to the hem. A BB with shorter rise in a way.
                Sounds at we will get it with this new pattern...[emoji7]

                Envoyé de mon iPhone en utilisant Tapatalk

                "Ignorance, allied with power, is the most ferocious enemy justice can have" James Baldwin.

                last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • AppfaffA
                  Appfaff
                  Raw and Unwashed
                  Joined:

                  Since I've been feeling nostalgic these days, I've been lusting after the perfect vintage fit. 1947 top block, 1966 thigh to knee and classic 505 knee down. This sounds like it might be just that. Hoping the vintage 18oz denim does well and we might see this cut in a classic looking/feeling denim.

                  In my mind, here is what a size 36 would look like:
                  Waist 36-37
                  front Rise: 12
                  Back Rise: 16.5
                  Thigh: 13.5
                  Knee 9.5
                  Hem: 8.25 @ 36" inseam and 8.5 at 34' inseam.

                  Essentially it's a 666 with a larger thigh and more taper from knee to hem… but I think that's what you guys are getting at anyways haha

                  last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • GilesG
                    Giles
                    IHUK Crew
                    Joined:

                    This is what I am targetting for a tag 36:
                    36w
                    12" front rise
                    16.5" back rise
                    13.5" thigh
                    9.5" knee
                    8.5" hem

                    EDIT - Measurements tweaked….

                    "OK face up to it - you're useless but generally pretty honest and straightforward . . . it's a rare combination of qualities that I have come to admire in you" - Geo 2011

                    last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • B
                      browniemcghee
                      Joined:

                      Then what would the thigh be on a 34? Sounds like a smaller thigh than the 634.  I think thigh measurement is the limit for many guys.

                      Sent from my SM-G920F using Tapatalk

                      last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • BroarkB
                        Broark
                        Joined:

                        Those look like some really good measurements on a size 36!

                        last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • neph93N
                          neph93
                          見習いボス
                          Joined:

                          Jepp. Anything between Appfaff's and Giles measurements would be sweet. Perhaps closer to 13.5 in the thigh for me, but 13 in 21oz would be fine.

                          I asked earlier but I'm rudely going to ask again, can you give a ballpark timeframe, Giles? Obviously it'll be a rough guess, but are we talking this side of summer or the other?

                          “Some of those that work forces
                          Are the same that burn crosses”

                          • Virginia Woolf
                          last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • GilesG
                            Giles
                            IHUK Crew
                            Joined:

                            This side…..

                            "OK face up to it - you're useless but generally pretty honest and straightforward . . . it's a rare combination of qualities that I have come to admire in you" - Geo 2011

                            last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • neph93N
                              neph93
                              見習いボス
                              Joined:

                              @Giles:

                              This side…..

                              Brilliant.

                              “Some of those that work forces
                              Are the same that burn crosses”

                              • Virginia Woolf
                              last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • GilesG
                                Giles
                                IHUK Crew
                                Joined:

                                @browniemcghee:

                                Then what would the thigh be on a 34?

                                Dunno.

                                Ask 100 people their opinion, you'll get 101 answers.  Sometimes shit just doesn't work out for everyone, I can't help or do anything about that….

                                But I agree, the thigh could be a little larger....

                                "OK face up to it - you're useless but generally pretty honest and straightforward . . . it's a rare combination of qualities that I have come to admire in you" - Geo 2011

                                last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • BroarkB
                                  Broark
                                  Joined:

                                  Actually, 13.5 on a 36 would be ideal. We'll see how it all shakes out!

                                  last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • DionD
                                    Dion
                                    Joined:

                                    Just my two cents but these measurements look way too close to the 555.

                                    last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • DrBabyhorseD
                                      DrBabyhorse
                                      Joined:

                                      @Appfaff:

                                      Since I've been feeling nostalgic these days, I've been lusting after the perfect vintage fit. 1947 top block, 1966 thigh to knee and classic 505 knee down. This sounds like it might be just that. Hoping the vintage 18oz denim does well and we might see this cut in a classic looking/feeling denim.

                                      In my mind, here is what a size 36 would look like:
                                      Waist 36-37
                                      front Rise: 12
                                      Back Rise: 16.5
                                      Thigh: 13.5
                                      Knee 9.5
                                      Hem: 8.25 @ 36" inseam and 8.5 at 34' inseam.

                                      Essentially it's a 666 with a larger thigh and more taper from knee to hem… but I think that's what you guys are getting at anyways haha

                                      Since we are similar sizes you might want to check out the 666 uhr. It looks like it is right on the money for you except for the hem. Mine came a tad under 9, which is close to your specifications.  I definitely think I found the perfect jean for me.

                                      Enviado desde mi iPhone utilizando Tapatalk

                                      last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • AppfaffA
                                        Appfaff
                                        Raw and Unwashed
                                        Joined:

                                        Thanks @DrBabyhorse - the measures do look great for the new UHR. I had the one ones in the 666 and loved them.

                                        last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • AppfaffA
                                          Appfaff
                                          Raw and Unwashed
                                          Joined:

                                          @Dion:

                                          Just my two cents but these measurements look way too close to the 555.

                                          My size 36 555-02 currently measure:
                                          Waist: 38.5
                                          Front Rise: 11.75
                                          Back Rise: 17.25
                                          Thigh: 13.25
                                          Knee: 8.6
                                          Leg: 8' at 33"

                                          I think the hardest part of these is the knee. 8.6 is after stretch, which means post wash they are about 8.3. that's a really drastic taper from thigh to knee and only about a .5' taper from knee to my hem, although the original 36" hem was closer to 7.8.  If you take the knee to a 9' (adding essentially 1.3' total space pre-stretch) you get a much roomier thigh overall.

                                          Your plans sound great @Giles - excited to see them in the future.

                                          last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • GilesG
                                            Giles
                                            IHUK Crew
                                            Joined:

                                            New jeans cut.

                                            Higher rise than IH-634 - particularly at the back.

                                            More taper from the knee than the 634.

                                            "OK face up to it - you're useless but generally pretty honest and straightforward . . . it's a rare combination of qualities that I have come to admire in you" - Geo 2011

                                            last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Copyright Iron Heart 2025.