IHSH-127 - 2015 Ultra Heavy Buffalo Check Western Shirts
-
Will have to track down a green now…
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
@Max:
So far all pictures make the green seem a bit darker than the 72. Which makes it interesting again.
I wouldn't describe this green hue as 'dark .. but I think, you check it out by V&S.
Of course I will
-
@Akuma:
Will have to track down a green now…
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
What size are you looking for in Green?
-
@manufc10 Large but in no rush. Treading lightly around the GF for at least a few weeks…
-
How did you size mate?
-
Got them yesterday in the mail, very excited about them. Sizing is perfect (I'm 5'11 and 178 lbs wearing an XL).
-
@Akuma:
@manufc10 Large but in no rush. Treading lightly around the GF for at least a few weeks…
Ha ha..I hear ya man. Well I guess I couldn't help you anyways as the one l'll put up for sale will be either an XL or an XXL.
-
@Akuma:
@manufc10 Large but in no rush. Treading lightly around the GF for at least a few weeks…
I think I got two more packages due over the next week (not IH) , wife is going to have to be talked too carefully!!
-
Picked these up on the way back home today. Love the red and the green and am uncertain about the grey. Fitpics to follow.
If you dont like the grey…
-
Interesting the split of opinions on the colours, the red immediatly appealed to me, the grey less so, just lacks the impact slightly… And the green well, I know it just plain wont suit me.
-
The gray is definitely my favorite. The other colors seem a little too lumberjack-esque in my opinion. Although besides indigo blue in jeans, everything I wear is black.
-
@cole must applaud the hat trick! Well done sir, well done.
-
For those of a size M persuasion you are fecked… Re checked the measurements and mine sadly bares zero reality to the published sizing, closer 'in real life' to my size Small 41 rather than the published numbers. Esp when compared to the published 101 numbers, le sigh... Basically the same shirt, same tag sizes but totally out of whack. Medium and down will going spare all round...
When I buy a 'designer' (vomit.) brand item from a made in europe or made in US manufacturer it's always fairly consistent measurement wise, when dealing with a higher end piece it makes no sense that the consistency can't be followed, pretty crappy for the end punters.
A bit of consistency is not too much to ask?
-
Strange as i have had no issues with the items I have ordered.
OK these are limited run, hand made garments so some variety is inevitable, but effectivly a whole size variation sounds like a mislabeled shirt maybe?maybe contact the crew and see what they can do?
-
If I understand your post correctly, the measurements you took on your shirt do not match those on the sizing table?
If that's right, then I'm sure IHUK will work with you.
-
For those of a size M persuasion you are fecked… Re checked the measurements and mine sadly bares zero reality to the published sizing, closer 'in real life' to my size Small 41 rather than the published numbers. Esp when compared to the published 101 numbers, le sigh... Basically the same shirt, same tag sizes but totally out of whack. Medium and down will going spare all round...
When I buy a 'designer' (vomit.) brand item from a made in europe or made in US manufacturer it's always fairly consistent measurement wise, when dealing with a higher end piece it makes no sense that the consistency can't be followed, pretty crappy for the end punters.
A bit of consistency is not too much to ask?
What the 101 measured is irrelevant, this was not the 101. We published sizing of actuals before they went live and as @Madame Buttonfly said above, her and @Winchy measured 2 of each and compared. If yours is out of whack then we'll take it back no questions asked or expected and at no cost to you.
But thanks for pointing it out, I'll make a point of bitching about it next time I sit down with the seamstresses, it's obviously something that we had not spotted before…..
-
For those of a size M persuasion you are fecked… Re checked the measurements and mine sadly bares zero reality to the published sizing, closer 'in real life' to my size Small 41 rather than the published numbers. Esp when compared to the published 101 numbers, le sigh... Basically the same shirt, same tag sizes but totally out of whack. Medium and down will going spare all round...
When I buy a 'designer' (vomit.) brand item from a made in europe or made in US manufacturer it's always fairly consistent measurement wise, when dealing with a higher end piece it makes no sense that the consistency can't be followed, pretty crappy for the end punters.
A bit of consistency is not too much to ask?
…I do recall the sizing issue being brought up prior to the live drop. Furthermore, Paula offered to measure shirts prior to shipping them out. I understand you're frustrated but, tone it down a bit. After all, IHUK offers returns for refunds.
