• Home
    • Recent
    • Calendar
    • Register
    • Login
    Iron Heart Forum
    Iron Heart Forum

    Iron Heart Fall/Winter 2025 Collection Preview - Now Live

    IH-777S-21 - Super-Slim Tapered 21oz Indigo Selvedge Jean - VERSION 1

    Bottoms
    64
    235
    80.5k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • MiiksM
      Miiks
      Haraki san Expert
      Joined:

      I know I've asked about this topic before.. When is 777-SII due, any estimate?

      last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • GilesG
        Giles
        IHUK Crew
        Joined:

        Not for ages (6 or so months probably).  I need to get the cut right in the 21oz selvedge first and I have not initiated that run yet…..

        "OK face up to it - you're useless but generally pretty honest and straightforward . . . it's a rare combination of qualities that I have come to admire in you" - Geo 2011

        last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • MiiksM
          Miiks
          Haraki san Expert
          Joined:

          @Giles:

          Not for ages (6 or so months probably).  I need to get the cut right in the 21oz selvedge first and I have not initiated that run yet…..

          Okay, thanks for the info. That sounds like a plan.

          last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • DionD
            Dion
            Joined:

            @Giles May I propose my thoughts on the upcoming improvements on the 777-cut? You're planning to lower the rise and my concern is that this is against IH's own philosophy because those jeans that barely cover the butt are only today's fashion and IH doesn't follow and doesn't have to (this is the greatest part of it). Additionally it'd be very odd to see someone with such a cut and an IH-patch on it. The other tweaks are great (the bigger thigh and the slightly smaller hem) but only as long as the rear rise stays in fashionless / comfortable regions to guarantee it will be a classic shape in 20 years.

            last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • GilesG
              Giles
              IHUK Crew
              Joined:

              I hear you, but if it was against Haraki's philosophy I can 100% assure you it would not be being done…..H and I know we need to differentiate it from the 555.

              Other views?

              "OK face up to it - you're useless but generally pretty honest and straightforward . . . it's a rare combination of qualities that I have come to admire in you" - Geo 2011

              last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • Bingo BallerB
                Bingo Baller
                Joined:

                @den213:

                @Giles May I propose my thoughts on the upcoming improvements on the 777-cut? You're planning to lower the rise and my concern is that this is against IH's own philosophy because those jeans that barely cover the butt are only today's fashion and IH doesn't follow and doesn't have to (this is the greatest part of it). Additionally it'd be very odd to see someone with such a cut and an IH-patch on it. The other tweaks are great (the bigger thigh and the slightly smaller hem) but only as long as the rear rise stays in fashionless / comfortable regions to guarantee it will be a classic shape in 20 years.

                I respectfully disagreed. For me as a middle aged man with no arse, its not.about fashion but all about comfort.
                Both of my pairs of IH in 666s & BB 31/32 have rear rises of 15"+ and it gives me a saggy behind as rise is too high for my frame, the jeans fit great everywhere else though.
                I'm sure a small reduction isnt going amount to us seeing everyones underwear.

                last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • DionD
                  Dion
                  Joined:

                  @Giles:

                  I hear you, but if it was against Haraki's philosophy I can 100% assure you it would not be being done…..H and I know we need to differentiate it from the 555.

                  Other views?

                  The 555 is great, it'd be even greater with a more fitted top-block, roomier thighs and the same small hem = this is what the 777 is about (right?). I was just a bit scared of the lower rise (the front one is good but the rear one :-).

                  last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • GilesG
                    Giles
                    IHUK Crew
                    Joined:

                    I think it's horses for courses.  The 555 and the 777 are meant to be different so they different body types and desired "look".

                    I don't want to merge the 777 into a 555 or vice versa.  One may prove to be popular and the other not.  Though I suspect both will sell well.

                    "OK face up to it - you're useless but generally pretty honest and straightforward . . . it's a rare combination of qualities that I have come to admire in you" - Geo 2011

                    last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • PeterP
                      Peter
                      啓蒙家
                      Joined:

                      Slightly larger thighs, slightly smaller hem and a lower rise; the perfect cut, at least for me.

                      last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • DionD
                        Dion
                        Joined:

                        I'll wait for the updated 777… the first edition sells quite well, doesn't it?

                        last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • GilesG
                          Giles
                          IHUK Crew
                          Joined:

                          Yes it does, but we are out of some sizes in the 555 which may account for some of those sales…...

                          "OK face up to it - you're useless but generally pretty honest and straightforward . . . it's a rare combination of qualities that I have come to admire in you" - Geo 2011

                          last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • Haddtoo 555H
                            Haddtoo 555
                            Joined:

                            For me the 555 reigns supreme….probs because I downsize end stretch the waist.... the top block is spot on, on me.

                            The trip 7's look intriguing .....except for the hemmmm....we are all different....kudos for the different cuts

                            madmonday's retired….I'm just tired.

                            last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • xtcclassicX
                              xtcclassic
                              啓蒙家
                              Joined:

                              Call me crazy but I like the measurements where they are now, at least in my size range (normally 33, but I'd take a 34 in these). When I look at measurements for the 555 and 666 in these sizes, they don't seem all that similar to me. As for the rise, I wouldn't lower it by more than 1 cm. The thigh, knee, and hem measurements seem perfect as is. If you increase the thigh measurement and decrease the hem measurement, that's when it starts looking like the 555 IMHO.

                              Here we go with the "ask a hundred assholes, get 101 opinions" conundrum. 😃

                              last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • GilesG
                                Giles
                                IHUK Crew
                                Joined:

                                "OK face up to it - you're useless but generally pretty honest and straightforward . . . it's a rare combination of qualities that I have come to admire in you" - Geo 2011

                                last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • SeulS
                                  Seul
                                  Joined:

                                  It's been a while since you had to use that, G!..  😉

                                  I agree with xtc though: love the measurements on this pair, but completely understand the need for a substantial difference with eg. the 555 series…

                                  I think this is a good way to reach a whole new spectrum of potential customers... On a private forum I attend, many people said these would be their first pair of IHs...

                                  And cause I'm not some selfish snob, I can only say the more people wear IH, the merrier...

                                  last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • L
                                    Lucius
                                    Joined:

                                    Throwing 2 cents into the well. Wouldn't mind a rise of 9.5 in a size 32 on this fit. Everything else is pretty great. I can understand the votes for bigger thighs but I like the current measurements; I'd just increase the knee 1/2cm.

                                    Anyway, that IH has an active dialogue with it's customers about its product is one of several things that will keep me coming back. You know what you're doing Giles, cheers!

                                    last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • daynymD
                                      daynym
                                      Joined:

                                      I am in for the lower rise as well. Wouldn´t mind 1-1,5 inches less in sz.33/34.The other measurements are ok so far. What you think, Giles? Will the tweaked version be available at fnc?

                                      why so serious?

                                      last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • GilesG
                                        Giles
                                        IHUK Crew
                                        Joined:

                                        Possible…..

                                        "OK face up to it - you're useless but generally pretty honest and straightforward . . . it's a rare combination of qualities that I have come to admire in you" - Geo 2011

                                        last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • Jordonf9J
                                          Jordonf9
                                          Raw and Unwashed
                                          Joined:

                                          Can't wait to see the next batch and fit, well and other denim too 😛

                                          Everyone wants their perfect fit, but it is trying to find that perfect in between for everyone. I think all looks good fit wise, just a little smaller hem. 8-8.25" hem with a 37.5" or so waist=glorious!

                                          So how long till we see a nice unsanforized, or possibly even a loomstate 777? 🙂

                                          Keep up the good work.

                                          last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • A
                                            Authentic04
                                            Joined:

                                            Will this cut ever come out in the Super black? This is the exact cut ive been looking for from IH. I had the 301 in indigo and missed them in black and have been waiting for something else to come out ever since! Either way these look great.

                                            last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Copyright Iron Heart 2025.