• Home
    • Recent
    • Calendar
    • Register
    • Login
    Iron Heart Forum
    Iron Heart Forum

    Iron Heart Fall/Winter 2025 Collection Preview - Now Live

    IH-777S-21 - Super-Slim Tapered 21oz Indigo Selvedge Jean - VERSION 1

    Bottoms
    64
    235
    80.5k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • Bingo BallerB
      Bingo Baller
      Joined:

      Great fits folks @Yury could I ask what  length you had them hemmed to and the leg opening measurement.  Just wondering if much width/taper is lost with hemming on the 32"., this looks like my ideal cut and a lower rear rise may be perfect for a "no-arse" like me

      last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • S
        Schlunta
        Joined:

        @Yury:

        I received my jeans. they are gorgeous
        Thank Giles

        Awesome fit mate, look forward to seeing the journey!

        last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • Jordonf9J
          Jordonf9
          Raw and Unwashed
          Joined:

          Great fit for you!

          Can't wait to see these in black to grey in the future 🙂

          last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • YuryY
            Yury
            Joined:

            @Bingo:

            Great fits folks @Yury could I ask what  length you had them hemmed to and the leg opening measurement.  Just wondering if much width/taper is lost with hemming on the 32"., this looks like my ideal cut and a lower rear rise may be perfect for a "no-arse" like me

            Thank you guys!
            Bingo Baller, the jeans' length is 36'' and hem's width is 18.5 cm
            If you cut jeans to 32'' then hem's width will be 19 cm

            last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • Bingo BallerB
              Bingo Baller
              Joined:

              @Yury Many thanks.

              last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • MiiksM
                Miiks
                Haraki san Expert
                Joined:

                I know I've asked about this topic before.. When is 777-SII due, any estimate?

                last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • GilesG
                  Giles
                  IHUK Crew
                  Joined:

                  Not for ages (6 or so months probably).  I need to get the cut right in the 21oz selvedge first and I have not initiated that run yet…..

                  "OK face up to it - you're useless but generally pretty honest and straightforward . . . it's a rare combination of qualities that I have come to admire in you" - Geo 2011

                  last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • MiiksM
                    Miiks
                    Haraki san Expert
                    Joined:

                    @Giles:

                    Not for ages (6 or so months probably).  I need to get the cut right in the 21oz selvedge first and I have not initiated that run yet…..

                    Okay, thanks for the info. That sounds like a plan.

                    last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • DionD
                      Dion
                      Joined:

                      @Giles May I propose my thoughts on the upcoming improvements on the 777-cut? You're planning to lower the rise and my concern is that this is against IH's own philosophy because those jeans that barely cover the butt are only today's fashion and IH doesn't follow and doesn't have to (this is the greatest part of it). Additionally it'd be very odd to see someone with such a cut and an IH-patch on it. The other tweaks are great (the bigger thigh and the slightly smaller hem) but only as long as the rear rise stays in fashionless / comfortable regions to guarantee it will be a classic shape in 20 years.

                      last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • GilesG
                        Giles
                        IHUK Crew
                        Joined:

                        I hear you, but if it was against Haraki's philosophy I can 100% assure you it would not be being done…..H and I know we need to differentiate it from the 555.

                        Other views?

                        "OK face up to it - you're useless but generally pretty honest and straightforward . . . it's a rare combination of qualities that I have come to admire in you" - Geo 2011

                        last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • Bingo BallerB
                          Bingo Baller
                          Joined:

                          @den213:

                          @Giles May I propose my thoughts on the upcoming improvements on the 777-cut? You're planning to lower the rise and my concern is that this is against IH's own philosophy because those jeans that barely cover the butt are only today's fashion and IH doesn't follow and doesn't have to (this is the greatest part of it). Additionally it'd be very odd to see someone with such a cut and an IH-patch on it. The other tweaks are great (the bigger thigh and the slightly smaller hem) but only as long as the rear rise stays in fashionless / comfortable regions to guarantee it will be a classic shape in 20 years.

                          I respectfully disagreed. For me as a middle aged man with no arse, its not.about fashion but all about comfort.
                          Both of my pairs of IH in 666s & BB 31/32 have rear rises of 15"+ and it gives me a saggy behind as rise is too high for my frame, the jeans fit great everywhere else though.
                          I'm sure a small reduction isnt going amount to us seeing everyones underwear.

                          last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • DionD
                            Dion
                            Joined:

                            @Giles:

                            I hear you, but if it was against Haraki's philosophy I can 100% assure you it would not be being done…..H and I know we need to differentiate it from the 555.

                            Other views?

                            The 555 is great, it'd be even greater with a more fitted top-block, roomier thighs and the same small hem = this is what the 777 is about (right?). I was just a bit scared of the lower rise (the front one is good but the rear one :-).

                            last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • GilesG
                              Giles
                              IHUK Crew
                              Joined:

                              I think it's horses for courses.  The 555 and the 777 are meant to be different so they different body types and desired "look".

                              I don't want to merge the 777 into a 555 or vice versa.  One may prove to be popular and the other not.  Though I suspect both will sell well.

                              "OK face up to it - you're useless but generally pretty honest and straightforward . . . it's a rare combination of qualities that I have come to admire in you" - Geo 2011

                              last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • PeterP
                                Peter
                                啓蒙家
                                Joined:

                                Slightly larger thighs, slightly smaller hem and a lower rise; the perfect cut, at least for me.

                                last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • DionD
                                  Dion
                                  Joined:

                                  I'll wait for the updated 777… the first edition sells quite well, doesn't it?

                                  last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • GilesG
                                    Giles
                                    IHUK Crew
                                    Joined:

                                    Yes it does, but we are out of some sizes in the 555 which may account for some of those sales…...

                                    "OK face up to it - you're useless but generally pretty honest and straightforward . . . it's a rare combination of qualities that I have come to admire in you" - Geo 2011

                                    last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • Haddtoo 555H
                                      Haddtoo 555
                                      Joined:

                                      For me the 555 reigns supreme….probs because I downsize end stretch the waist.... the top block is spot on, on me.

                                      The trip 7's look intriguing .....except for the hemmmm....we are all different....kudos for the different cuts

                                      madmonday's retired….I'm just tired.

                                      last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • xtcclassicX
                                        xtcclassic
                                        啓蒙家
                                        Joined:

                                        Call me crazy but I like the measurements where they are now, at least in my size range (normally 33, but I'd take a 34 in these). When I look at measurements for the 555 and 666 in these sizes, they don't seem all that similar to me. As for the rise, I wouldn't lower it by more than 1 cm. The thigh, knee, and hem measurements seem perfect as is. If you increase the thigh measurement and decrease the hem measurement, that's when it starts looking like the 555 IMHO.

                                        Here we go with the "ask a hundred assholes, get 101 opinions" conundrum. 😃

                                        last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • GilesG
                                          Giles
                                          IHUK Crew
                                          Joined:

                                          "OK face up to it - you're useless but generally pretty honest and straightforward . . . it's a rare combination of qualities that I have come to admire in you" - Geo 2011

                                          last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • SeulS
                                            Seul
                                            Joined:

                                            It's been a while since you had to use that, G!..  😉

                                            I agree with xtc though: love the measurements on this pair, but completely understand the need for a substantial difference with eg. the 555 series…

                                            I think this is a good way to reach a whole new spectrum of potential customers... On a private forum I attend, many people said these would be their first pair of IHs...

                                            And cause I'm not some selfish snob, I can only say the more people wear IH, the merrier...

                                            last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Copyright Iron Heart 2025.