Watches - another OCD problem
-
great shit guys! @Anesthetist @Jii @Sugar Mountain
thanks mate! @jock1624 …the 007 was the watch I've actually ordered
since they shopped the ring one I went ahead and bought the kinetic! the 007 or a different one from Seiko is next in the list! maybe next month... -
get the 007 with the with the pepsi dial. i find that really nice..
-
hahaha. maybe because i have one that's why i'd fancy it that much. though i'm still longing for the gmt with the pepsi bezel
ps. my previous post should've been bezel instead of dial…
-
New one from Seiko. Unfortunately haven't seen any pics yet of it on a strap other than the nasty stock one…..
-
awww those lume….
-
hahaha. maybe because i have one that's why i'd fancy it that much. though i'm still longing for the gmt with the pepsi bezel
Each their own mate :). If we all liked the same things it'd be very boring. I like the look, just see it a lot.
Still thinking an IWC might be my next at some point….
-
Each their own mate :). If we all liked the same things it'd be very boring. I like the look, just see it a lot.
That's part of my disinterest in Rolexes- I see them a lot. In fact, today I saw a Datejust, a Sub, and a Daytona at a worksite that had 10-15 people. No Pepsi bezels, to be fair.
-
I love datejusts! Can definitely see myself owning one eventually…
-
Despite the fact that Rolexes are so popular, I still plan to buy a Sub in the next couple of years - it's a classic design that's been copied by all and sundry, but it's still the original, and possibly definitive 'tool' watch.
In a similar vein, if Rolex ever decide to price the new Cerachrom Pepsi bezel GMT in line with the standard GMT's, I'll definitely be picking one of those up too!
-
My love for the Rolex sub is fading in direct proportion to my rising love for the Tudor snowflake sub.
-
That's part of my disinterest in Rolexes- I see them a lot.
I generally at least try under play my hand a little bit on first glance. Fair enough when you get to know me I may be a wanker who spends too much on fancy stuff and be a DINK, however, from that first glance before I've opened my mouth, there's no impression, other than neat or put together…That's what I aim for anyhow....either that or unique, but not in a "unique" way, just not the same as the others...
-
^compleyely agree snowy.
Also, can anyone explain to me the relationship, if there is any, between Rolex and Tudor? For some reason I recall that on a watch forum they were under the same sub thread…
-
Tudor is daughter Company of rolex which is owned by the family foundation.
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rolex
If you come to Zurich you'll see all brands and models on the wrists of people from all over the world, very exciting. I had once the pleasure to meet jarno Trulli the F1 Pilot who is ambassadeur for audemaurs piguet. At this event someone had a backpack full of watches way over a Million worth, crazy pretty nice guy
I love rolex had some and will prob buy one again in future. Atm i am wearing owning no watches beside a present from my love
And re the "Image" of rolex i dont care, they are Tool watches. Engineer watch in 50's = milgauss, first watch on Mount Everest = Hillary explorer, first watch through channel to England on a swimmers wrist = oyster case, watches on oil plattforms in 70's = comex sub, Concorde Pilots watches = GMT etc
