All Things Mac/ Apple
-
Shit :o
Bad news G San
-
I'm overprotective with my belongings. I always get some sort of insurance on my apple devices and usually have a case for them. There's no way I would sit on my glass iPhone though, let alone any other electronics.
Finally, someone else who doesn't sit on their phone. Clearly we're the odd one's out here. Amazing and exciting. Will be chatting about in the office over coming weeks to see where people stick their phones!
-
I'm sure plenty of people don't sit on them, but as phones get larger the front pocket's a non-starter, especially for jeans-wearers.
-
Mine goes from left pocket all the time, just to draw hate from phone fade bitches
-
I'm sure plenty of people don't sit on them, but as phones get larger the front pocket's a non-starter, especially for jeans-wearers.
The 6+ is perfectly fine in my front pocket.
-
Just to reassure you, Snowy, I don't sit on my phone either.
I'm also not very careful with it, and have dropped it many, many, many times. I'm on my second case- the first one was cracked at all four corners (phone is still pristine; Seidio Surface cases ftw). When I put it in a pocket, it's in the right rear one. Also just for reference, my phone is bigger than the 6+, especially with the case, and it fits fine in the front pocket, but it's easier to get in and out of the back pockets
-
me too. i don't ever sit on my phone at all. yes it's in the back pocket when i'm walking etc but once i sit. out it comes..
-
Yeah my 6" screen phone and case fit in the front pocket too but its a hassle to get in and out and (sorry Gav) would make ridiculous looking fades because it would destroy the creases on the left side of the jean. Not that that's a real consideration, convenience trumps all n
-
There's a review of the iPhone 6 Plus on the Register.
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2014/09/23/apple_iphone_6_plus_review/
What really got me was this: "Eyebrow-raisingly, therefore, the iPhone 6 Plus renders a 2208x1242 display downscaled to 1920x1080." That seems badly like a thought out solution, but it's probably the easiest way to work around API limitations and hardware availability.
-
Gross. I was reading a rumor that the Nexus 6 is going to have a 498 PPI screen. These arms races around specs aren't good for consumers. I can't imagine driving so many pixels is at all helpful for battery considerations.
-
Magazines are printed at 300 DPI, and I wouldn't see a lot of utility in going over that for a resolution. The Nexus 5 currently has a 445 PPI screen, and that's more than sharp enough.
Battery life on the Nexus 5 sucks. Given the slow pace of development in lithium ion tech, I can't see a bigger screened Nexus 6 (if it exists) as being helpful, unless Google go with a higher capacity (i.e. heavier) cell.
It's all marketing hype. About the only place I can see an advantage for a greater than 1920 x 1080 resolution is if you sit in one of the front rows of an IMAX cinema. (Which I have been known to do…) Beyond that your eyes probably won't be able to see the difference.
-
Well, a larger screen almost necessarily means a larger battery…
-
#bendgate is BS? (via DF)
Consumer Reports:
All the phones we tested showed themselves to be pretty tough. The iPhone 6 Plus, the more robust of the new iPhones in our testing, started to deform when we reached 90 pounds of force, and came apart with 110 pounds of force. With those numbers, it slightly outperformed the HTC One (which is largely regarded as a sturdy, solid phone), as well as the smaller iPhone 6, yet underperformed some other smart phones. […]
Below you can see the pictures of the smart phone carnage, but bear in mind that it took significant force to do this kind of damage to all these phones. While nothing is (evidently) indestructible, we expect that any of these phones should stand up to typical use.
Consumer Reports is the outfit that made Antennagate a thing. If anything, their reputation is such that you’d expect them to fan the flames on this, not extinguish them. They’re saying the iPhone 6 Plus is even more bend-resistant than the regular 6. This should put an end to Bendgate — but it won’t, because in the minds of the deranged, the new iPhones bend like a chocolate bar left out in the sun.
http://www.consumerreports.org/cro/news/2014/09/consumer-reports-tests-iphone-6-bendgate/index.htm
-
What's interesting to me is that Apple's and their testing seems to have done by stressing the center of the phone. The weak point is off-center, near the volume controls. Were I Apple, my tests would run a roller along the long axis of the phone under pressure so that I could identify such weak points.
But yeah, it does appear to be a non-issue.
-
There's a review of the Apple Watch on aBlogToWatch:
http://www.ablogtowatch.com/apple-watch-hands-on-review/
And they posted a video too, but that looks like an Apple commercial, rather than something they put together.
The Watch looks less nerdy than the Android equivalents, and the design is a lot slicker. Then again, no-one makes technology as nice as Apple.
I like the look of the zooming in UI, but whether the UX works well in practice is something I can't tell from here. I suspect it will, because that's another of Apple's strengths.
Where the Android devices will win out is in the Google notifications. The card system you get on the current (KitKat, Ice Cream Sandwich) versions is translated directly onto the watches and Glass. Google is using its expertise in data and its stalker tendencies to predict what you want, and I'm not sure Apple can compete with this.
Lastly, if you compare the back of the Apple Watch with something like the Basis Fitness Tracker, it looks as though there's a heart rate sensor built in. I suspect it's going to be ahead of 90% of the market on being able to monitor your activity.
-
Definitely can monitor heart rate. The review is strange. I don't think there are any real review units, and a lot of it is very speculative, for example the discussion on battery life. At best anyone's "hands-on" wasn't with an Apple Watch, but an Apple Watch prototype.
