Self Edge SF, NY, LA, PDX, MX, & ATX
-
that denim looks really nice. wish i had another set of legs to jump in a pair of those 633s . . . . would love to hear how you all came up with 633 for the number of the jean.
-
that denim looks really nice. wish i had another set of legs to jump in a pair of those 633s . . . . would love to hear how you all came up with 633 for the number of the jean.
I wish there was some really magical story behind this, but there isn't. Iron Heart asked what we wanted the new fit to be called and we just figured.. "well… it's the 634s but with a little taken off the bottom, so how about 633s?".
-
633 looks good. Now I just need to obsess a bit about the measurements and decide sizing and how much to hem. Good times.
-
634 minus 1 sounds good for some, but with the inseam we are going to get into the age old debate about it changing once you hem it, blah, blah meh.
i have to say i like the denim used on this project, that jacket is going to be insane after some wear.
-
Kiya, any estimate of the hem? The 634 tends to be in the 8.5 range. What's the difference in the 633? 7.5?
-
634 minus 1 sounds good for some, but with the inseam we are going to get into the age old debate about it changing once you hem it, blah, blah meh.
i have to say i like the denim used on this project, that jacket is going to be insane after some wear.
Once you see the denim in person you'll just KNOW that these jeans and jackets are going to age in a crazy way. You should go into the store if you have time to see them in their raw state.
@Spring:
Kiya, any estimate of the hem? The 634 tends to be in the 8.5 range. What's the difference in the 633? 7.5?
You mean the actual measurement of the 633s?
If so, they're right here:
http://www.selfedge.com/shop/index.php?main_page=product_info&cPath=71&products_id=1196 -
634 minus 1 sounds good for some, but with the inseam we are going to get into the age old debate about it changing once you hem it, blah, blah meh.
That's not a debate for me. Cutting 2 inches off the bottom is only going to widen the opening an eighth of an inch or less. Not even worth worrying about.
Like you said- blah, blah, meh.
-
My size is only 0.2" smaller at the hem than the 634S cut anyway, a subtly cut it seems.
-
634 minus 1 sounds good for some, but with the inseam we are going to get into the age old debate about it changing once you hem it, blah, blah meh.
That's not a debate for me. Cutting 2 inches off the bottom is only going to widen the opening an eighth of an inch or less. Not even worth worrying about.
Like you said- blah, blah, meh.Do keep in mind that this is made of unsanforized denim, meaning the hem width will shrink about .3" after a hot soak.
-
Kiya, Is the new jacket cut the same as the OD modified III that you are currently selling? Just getting a sense of fit.
edit. Sorry, didn't see the measurements were posted until just now. I'll do my homework
-
Do keep in mind that this is made of unsanforized denim, meaning the hem width will shrink about .3" after a hot soak.
Yep, the unsanforized aspect is why I'm wavering between size 33 and 34- trying to decide how the thigh is going to work out after shrinkage.
-
I'll have the jacket and 301 on Saturday. Gonna be some interesting fades.
-
^looking forward to seeing these
-
If only we had somebody who could properly photograph them!
Yea ditto man. I don't mean to be negative but those pics on the SE site tell me nothing. That bro is not wearing the 633 as they should be worn.
