Random questions to which you seek an answer
-
Here are the sums…...
Take the difference between the knee and the cuff - lets say 0.5"
Then on a 36" inseam there is 23" between knee and cuff (36-13)
There is thus 0.5/23" or 1/46" or 0.0217" increase in cuff, per inch you shorten the inseam by
Say you cut off 6" and the cuff was 9", then the new cuff would be about 9.13" (9 + 0.0217" * 6)Edit. Fixed because I'm dumb and GMB has a larger brain than me....
-
Good math, but you would add rather than subtract, right?
-
I'm looking for suggestions for a classic looking old school vintage sneaker type of footwear, simple right? Apart from I cannot wear Converse or Vans (I have a high arch so something as flat as these literally murders my feet), nothing too sporty (no Nike Air Max), and I absolutely hate GATs (I just think they look so boring).
Any other suggestions?
-
I'm looking for suggestions for a classic looking old school vintage sneaker type of footwear, simple right? Apart from I cannot wear Converse or Vans (I have a high arch so something as flat as these literally murders my feet), nothing too sporty (no Nike Air Max), and I absolutely hate GATs (I just think they look so boring).
Any other suggestions?
Boots. I hear White's have nice arches. Real vintagey sneakers!
-
Actually Gav, you're looking for something that doesn't exist. What I would suggest is getting the sneakers you like aesthetically, and use substantial insoles like these http://www.yoursole.com/us/mens/footbeds/insulated-ultra/
-
Thanks man, Nate PM'd me and pretty much said the same thing. I just can't get on with Chucks, I've tried several pairs and they just feel cheap and nasty.
-
then get these
http://www.denimbro.com/1917-converse-production-run_topic846.html
Maybe they differ from current Chucks
-
perhaps the chucks with nikes lunarlon insole?
-
Have you tried New Balance?
I know its a different aesthetic from converse/vans, but you do still get that super classic look. I like the 574s, 996s, 1300s…
Like this: http://www.zappos.com/new-balance-classics-ml574-grey-burgundy
Or your could go for Reebok Classics…not something I see around alot, but in that same vintage vein.
Like this: http://www.zappos.com/reebok-lifestyle-classic-nylon-r13-carbon-reebok-navy-white
Or you could go the classic Nike route. I'm a big fan of the Blazer:
http://www.zappos.com/nike-sb-blazer-mid-lr-armory-navy-university-red-white
And also the cortez (not my favorite….but a classic nonetheless)
http://www.zappos.com/nike-cortez-leather-black-white-white
And I know there are more I'm forgetting…
-
Thanks for all the assists guys, up until about 4 years ago I was quite a sneaker head but Whites have ruined me for sports shoes.
I've gone against my better judgement and opted for some winterised CT's (made of leather, lined etc). Hoping they work out.
-
The Premium line from Converse are super comfortable, they have better quality insoles.
Also, Buttero, Common Projects and Svensson make nice shoes.
If I could get some of these I'd be a happy dude.
Converse x SAK
-
I can't believe no one has suggested PF Flyers yet. Seriously, classic vintage look, and reasonable arch support. If you don't like it, the insole is removable, so you can pop in an aftermarket one. Go with the Center, either high or low. All that for around $50.
What is wrong with you people? Hell, they're even Injun Jack approved…
-
Ok, forget Gav's question. He bought some sneakers already.
Which companies make boots in a light Natural leather right now?
Like this, but not hikers.
-
I know this question has been asked to death, and it's the bane of this forum…but thats not gonna stop me.
If I can wear a 38" waist jean snug but comfy, it would make sense to do either the IHxB01 in a 38 (37 measured, but with stretch over time) or the 666XHS in a 38 (39 measured, but little/no stretch). That makes sense, right?
