Which Cell Phone do you own?
-
I have a bad record with phones. I had a Blackberry that was utter crap (Julie made me buy it), a Samsung phone with a sliding keyboard, which was fine, except it was about 2 inches thick, then an HTC Thunderbolt, which had battery life that measured in minutes, not hours. Now I have a Samsung Galaxy Note 2, which I bought for its gigantic screen. After using for a few months, I realize it's too big- for practical purposes, it's a phone that requires 2 hands to use.
Needless to say, I'm a bit soured on the whole American system of buying/upgrading your cell phone every two years. Bravo for deciding to opt out, Mega. The way I see it, the longer you can easily keep your old phone, the better off you are.
-
I don't agree with planned obsolescence conspiracy theories. It's entropy and technology limitations. Batteries and flash memory degrade and software gets more complex so hardware requirements get more robust. And there's no reason to spend a bunch of money trying to get advanced preservation technologies into these things because that ignores how technology (let alone phone contracts) works. Unless there's ever a modular platform, phones will always obsolesce in a certain timeframe.
That's EXACTLY what I call planned obsolescence
-
I think that's a cynical way to parse it though, it carries an implication of them engineering it to fail.
-
Yeah, agree. What you've stated is what happens in the real world and engineering developments/evolution/Moore's Law etc. That's different to the definition of planned obsolescence. Progress and evolution has a side effect of technology obsolescence, in that regard, I plan for it's obsolescence…
Probably the day-job hat coming through, I've been planning/scaling/building clouds for many years, always looking into future trends when modeling CAPEX/OPEX costs. EG do we buy 100TB today, or 200TB in a year, and what's the $/GB/Watt measure & $/GB/RackUnit & $/GB/HumanInterfacing....
My wrong use of the term, laziness on my behalf, #mybad.
-
Not at all it's a valid way to break it down, semantically you could look at it either way. But my feeling is that for the most part they are trying to align to natural evolutionary cycles in tech, like Moore's Law. I'm just saying that I don't believe they are putting R&D into "how can we make this break after exactly two years?"
-
Just ditched my 25 month old galaxy s2 for the new nexus 5 yesterday.
While the s2 was still performing fine for the most part it was starting to slow down and the charging port was getting pretty janky. I like the s2 size better but the n5 sure is fast and sleek. Better response on the touchscreen too.
-
From a quick look they are basically the same phone with the nexus 5 having a better battery life and the z1 having a better camera otherwise everything else looks comparable.
I have been waiting for the nexus because it generally receives timelier software updates and it runs a stock android system with no extra bloatware other manufactures put on their phones.
-
I'd go for the Nexus 5. Better battery life and stock android beats just about any other feature. I'm considering rooting my phone just to get rid of the clutter Samsung and Verizon have forced on me.
-
Three. It's only reasonable given how technology curves work to either try to head off the curve and maximize the length of time a device with be useful, or just always get the cheapest possible functional device that doesn't drive you crazy to use.
-
I say get the external charger. Make that thing last as long as possible.
