ULTRA HEAVY RAW - IH-1955-UHR, IH-666-UHR and IH-634-UHR

[simonc]

Besides the shape which I of course prefer the main advantage of the higher rise on 1955's when made out of 21oz and up (23oz) is the yoke fastens over the hips which means the weight of the denim is locked to the torso and will not sag or slip, as the 634's are only secured around the waist not over the hip bone.  This was an instant joy moving from 634's too 1955's it made the heft of the jeans near unnoticeable to wear.

[Finn666]

@Nerkg:

@Finn666:

634+taper+hem is what (I think) I'll do!
…best fitting top block/rise, best "range of motion" in the best freaking denim alive, with just a bit of too much denim in the calf/ankle area imo!

Depends on what size. Smaller sizes are much slimmer from knee down

that's why the "is what I'll do!" part in my sentence being a w34-w35 in these you have to do crazy shit like that!

[fanya]

Ya that rise on the 1955 is almost an inch higher in the front, not sure if I can handle that.

Although I will say after all my bitching about the MBBs rise, now that I have become accustomed to it and the denim has softened up, I do like it now, it's nice not having to wear a belt and these jeans just sit on the hips and I don't have to constantly pull them up.

[Adman103]

Before my days of denim enlightenment, I used to only wear boot cut jeans- and the 634S actually felt tight around the ankles for me at first!  I really think they're perfect now- the way they cuff around boots is ideal for me.  I'm getting excited for the 21/23 634S!

[TinMan]

Form filled out….  I have already sold my soul for at least one pair of 1955 raw !!!  Since I have leverage on satan I am hoping to get Two!!

[TinMan]

@simonc:

Besides the shape which I of course prefer the main advantage of the higher rise on 1955's when made out of 21oz and up (23oz) is the yoke fastens over the hips which means the weight of the denim is locked to the torso and will not sag or slip, as the 634's are only secured around the waist not over the hip bone.  This was an instant joy moving from 634's too 1955's it made the heft of the jeans near unnoticeable to wear.

Yep!!!  People are scared of high rise, but I find them to be more comfortable and I am not constantly pulling up my britches!  Wait I mean they are horrible do not buy these in raw…. save them for me and Simonc

[ronaldlsh]

No chance for the SExIH07 cut??

[tatmantall]

My guess would be since giles is commissioning this, that it will not be done in a Cut that is Self edge exclusive… Though I could be wrong

[Giles]

You aren't..

[Dentman]

Would like to see the 634's with the higher rise of the 1955's.  Failing that, the 1955's with a wider hem.

[Giles]

VO is working on a new patch.  I have decided not to call this 21/23oz, as that is a little cumbersome from an aesthetic pov.  I have christened the new batch of denim UHR - Ultra Heavy Raw….

[Seul]

I like that!.. UUUUHHHHHHRRRRRRRRRRR

[Adman103]

@Giles:

VO is working on a new patch.  I have decided not to call this 21/23oz, as that is a little cumbersome from an aesthetic pov.  I have christened the new batch of denim UHR - Ultra Heavy Raw….

Coooool….  Love it.  Can't wait to see the new patch design.

[Giles]

@Giles:

Lot Numbers:

IH-666S-RAW
IH-634S-RAW
IH-1955S-RAW

OK - New lot numbers (no need to re-complete the form, we will catch both variants):

IH-666S-UHR
IH-634S-UHR
IH-1955S-UHR

[llvlaglne]

only 2 cuts now?

[Giles]

Whoops.  Fixing now…..

[Morose_Penguin]

Modified post to excuse own stupidity… within the next few weight releases surely you'll run out of cool sounding modifiers.

[summ3rhays]

@Seul:

I like that!.. UUUUHHHHHHRRRRRRRRRRR

Exactly how I read it. 

[Blackheart]

Hmmm…I shall entertain the 666's I believe.

[derivative666]

I'm assuming this is a next year release?

"Obstacles are stepping-stones that guide us to our goals"