ULTRA HEAVY RAW - IH-1955-UHR, IH-666-UHR and IH-634-UHR
-
Yep, true story… That's why mine look so slim fit
-
Besides the shape which I of course prefer the main advantage of the higher rise on 1955's when made out of 21oz and up (23oz) is the yoke fastens over the hips which means the weight of the denim is locked to the torso and will not sag or slip, as the 634's are only secured around the waist not over the hip bone. This was an instant joy moving from 634's too 1955's it made the heft of the jeans near unnoticeable to wear.
-
634+taper+hem is what (I think) I'll do!
…best fitting top block/rise, best "range of motion" in the best freaking denim alive, with just a bit of too much denim in the calf/ankle area imo!Depends on what size. Smaller sizes are much slimmer from knee down
that's why the "is what I'll do!" part in my sentence
being a w34-w35 in these you have to do crazy shit like that! -
Ya that rise on the 1955 is almost an inch higher in the front, not sure if I can handle that.
Although I will say after all my bitching about the MBBs rise, now that I have become accustomed to it and the denim has softened up, I do like it now, it's nice not having to wear a belt and these jeans just sit on the hips and I don't have to constantly pull them up.
-
Besides the shape which I of course prefer the main advantage of the higher rise on 1955's when made out of 21oz and up (23oz) is the yoke fastens over the hips which means the weight of the denim is locked to the torso and will not sag or slip, as the 634's are only secured around the waist not over the hip bone. This was an instant joy moving from 634's too 1955's it made the heft of the jeans near unnoticeable to wear.
Yep!!! People are scared of high rise, but I find them to be more comfortable and I am not constantly pulling up my britches! Wait I mean they are horrible do not buy these in raw….
save them for me and Simonc -
My guess would be since giles is commissioning this, that it will not be done in a Cut that is Self edge exclusive… Though I could be wrong
-
Would like to see the 634's with the higher rise of the 1955's. Failing that, the 1955's with a wider hem.
if so. I'm not overly fond, but prefer it to crazy tight thighs, or non-workable jeans.
