ULTRA HEAVY RAW - IH-1955-UHR, IH-666-UHR and IH-634-UHR

[Giles]

I'm considering them, don't fret….....

[simonc]

aww, smiley face, nice Giles.  I would add the 666s must be in there too, I just woken up to them recently.

[Giles]

So, if H can remake the denim.

We'll do
634
666
1955

[simonc]

good call

[Simon H]

nice one!

[tatmantall]

WOOOOOHOOOOOOO!!!!!

[Giles]

Yeah, Yeah, Yeah - and we'll make a gangly version especially for you…..

[JCMx800]

The 1955 really teases me!!! 1955 or 634, we´ll see, but I would order one

[mclaincausey]

What a beautiful thing…

[Chris]

@Giles:

So, if H can remake the denim.

We'll do
634
666
1955

Let's not get too excited…

[llvlaglne]

I'd put money down if the rise on the 55s will be lowered

[Nerkg]

I LOVE low rise. They can sag just a tiny bit and not look saggy

[grandmasterben]

Lowered '55 rise is more normal than "low," it wouldn't be a '55 anymore but that's not such a bad thing….although I seriously doubt they're going to test a new cut in 21/23 oz.

[Max Power]

Well, even my LVC 201 don't have such a long rise as the IH 1955. If the FR was around 12" and the backrise around 15,5" (size 33/34) it would still be long and I think also historically more acurate. And much more wearable. It could also come in a different name to differ from the current 1955.

[Giles]

The rise on our version of the 55 is the exact same size as a pair of LVC 55 that I had.  I do not know what year the LVC's were, as I no longer have them here.

The rise will not change.  They are what they are and if you don't like it, buy something else.

[Graeme]

If the 21/23 oz denim comes off, then I'd be up for a pair of the 1955s. Even with the enormously tall rise.

[Snowy]

I'm in! Will take a 55 as is thanks

IF it gets made, of course.

[Oleg]

634 for me,maybe a bit slimmer fitted with lower rise like vulcans would be nice

[Alex81]

555-01 for me… ::)

[tatmantall]

Scuba suit for me.