• Home
    • Recent
    • Calendar
    • Register
    • Login
    Iron Heart Forum
    Iron Heart Forum

    Iron Heart Fall/Winter 2025 Collection Preview - Now Live

    ULTRA HEAVY RAW - IH-1955-UHR, IH-666-UHR and IH-634-UHR

    Bottoms
    97
    669
    151.4k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • fanyaF
      fanya
      Joined:

      634

      last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • fanyaF
        fanya
        Joined:

        If it was made once why can't it be made again?

        last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • JCar2666J
          JCar2666
          Joined:

          ^Always wondered that too.  It's not a collab issue

          last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • llvlaglneL
            llvlaglne
            Joined:

            It was made twice. But if a 3rd happens, 634 cut again pls

            "…think of a world tour as similar as to the sisterhood of the traveling pants." -LandoCal126

            last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • ChrisC
              Chris
              Raw and Unwashed
              Joined:

              I would never wear them, but I bet the 555 and 666 models would sell really well.

              last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • llvlaglneL
                llvlaglne
                Joined:

                I don't think the 555 will be a big seller, look what happened with the 555-02

                "…think of a world tour as similar as to the sisterhood of the traveling pants." -LandoCal126

                last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • N
                  Nerkg
                  Banned
                  Joined:

                  634. With same larger measurements.

                  last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • urbanwoodsmanU
                    urbanwoodsman
                    Banned
                    Joined:

                    @llvlaglne:

                    I don't think the 555 will be a big seller, look what happened with the 555-02

                    What happened?

                    Aren't the 555-01 and 555-02 being rerun already?

                    How many cuts "fly off the shelves" anyways?

                    Btw: Agree with you 100%, Chris.

                    last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • llvlaglneL
                      llvlaglne
                      Joined:

                      It doesn't change the fact that they're getting a rerun but the 555-02 sold extremely slow for some reason compared to the 01.

                      "…think of a world tour as similar as to the sisterhood of the traveling pants." -LandoCal126

                      last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • N
                        Nerkg
                        Banned
                        Joined:

                        I would figure the 555 is generally not a popular cut
                        As the 634, Giles def said the 555-18 raw was the worst selling by far, if that's the555-2

                        last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • D
                          davidl890
                          Joined:

                          I'm in for a 666

                          last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • derivative666D
                            derivative666
                            Joined:

                            666 agreed

                            "Obstacles are stepping-stones That guide us to our goals"

                            "honorable mention to the bearded giant aka derivative666 for being a stand up dude & not changing with the seasons since i've been around these parts" Monday

                            last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • RocknRollR
                              RocknRoll
                              Joined:

                              The two ends of the spectrum are:

                              1. The financially 'safe' option. The three highest selling cuts (I think), i.e. 634, 666, BB

                              2. The 'exciting' option, i.e. something new. I liked Seul's suggestion of a cut resembling the SEIH07, and I'm also a huge fan of the Indo cut (which I'm sure would have sold like hotcakes under a different name). Both these options have a more aggressive lower leg taper than the IH standards, so dunno how Haraki would feel about this. I'm not suggesting a direct ripoff of Kiya's work, but definitively something in that direction.

                              Of course, with potential for 700+ pairs, there would be plenty of scope to slide along that spectrum, and do some blend of options 1 and 2.

                              last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • C
                                CLJ
                                Raw and Unwashed
                                Joined:

                                Backing Urbanwoodsman's idea with a strong emphasis on thigh/waist proportion.

                                last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • ?
                                  Guest
                                  Joined:

                                  Create a "Progressive" Cut: 
                                    1. Cuts like the 666, 555, and IHxB do not work for people with waists 31" and under (ME!):
                                    -The top block is too small, or the thigh measurement is too small, or the knee and leg opening are too small     
                                    2. Cuts like the 634 and DC4… do not work for larger folk:
                                    -The knee and/or leg opening is much too large to be practical/comfortable

                                  So, smaller people need a straight cut (except for some female customers), and larger people need a slight/moderate taper...

                                  Why not make a cut that is a straight 634 from sizes 28-31, and then using the top block from the 634 make sizes 32-35 similar to the 666 from the mid-thigh down, and finally make sizes 36-40 similar to the 555 from the mid-thigh down?

                                  Of course I am speaking with a 634 bias.  23oz. jeans should never be skin tight

                                  last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • babyknightB
                                    babyknight
                                    啓蒙家
                                    Joined:

                                    666

                                    last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • urbanwoodsmanU
                                      urbanwoodsman
                                      Banned
                                      Joined:

                                      @adam313:

                                      Create a "Progressive" Cut: 
                                        1. Cuts like the 666, 555, and IHxB do not work for people with waists 31" and under (ME!):
                                        -The top block is too small, or the thigh measurement is too small, or the knee and leg opening are too small     
                                        2. Cuts like the 634 and DC4… do not work for larger folk:
                                        -The knee and/or leg opening is much too large to be practical/comfortable

                                      So, smaller people need a straight cut (except for some female customers), and larger people need a slight/moderate taper...

                                      Why not make a cut that is a straight 634 from sizes 28-31, and then using the top block from the 634 make sizes 32-35 similar to the 666 from the mid-thigh down, and finally make sizes 36-40 similar to the 555 from the mid-thigh down?

                                      Of course I am speaking with a 634 bias.  23oz. jeans should never be skin tight

                                      Thanks for this. Exactly what I've been trying to say(with bias towards the bigger sizes).

                                      One cut for all would be a dream. I know most of you think the 634 is that, but it's one of the most unflattering cuts I've ever seen on anyone size 34 up with inseam 32in and smaller.

                                      The Final Cut would require major thigh to knee and knee to hem tapering(which IH has never done that I know of).

                                      last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • Finn666F
                                        Finn666
                                        Joined:

                                        adam, sounds like a plan buddy! a cut like that is what is "missing" imo…

                                        last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • G
                                          grandmasterben
                                          Joined:

                                          I hate sounding like one of those dudes that's obsessed with leg warmer denim, but for me the 634s cut with about a half inch smaller hem would be perfection.

                                          last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • llvlaglneL
                                            llvlaglne
                                            Joined:

                                            Agreed with grandmasterben. Almost like TFH 3009

                                            "…think of a world tour as similar as to the sisterhood of the traveling pants." -LandoCal126

                                            last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Copyright Iron Heart 2025.