Your browser does not seem to support JavaScript. As a result, your viewing experience will be diminished, and you have been placed in read-only mode.
Please download a browser that supports JavaScript, or enable it if it's disabled (i.e. NoScript).
G, the measurements are the defintives one? minus 2 inches from the knee to the hem…?
That is a pic of the 666S. The patch on the 666SB has not been imprinted with lot number or size…..
@Finn666:
"heavy ounce" better than blank space so yeah, gets my vote as well! don't forget to add a "B" to the 666S though
same here
I will talk to Tom and H about whether we need to further refine the measurements before production. Are you asking length of inseam? It is currently 37, but I will likely reduce that to 35 or 36..
hem is going to get even bigger then, right?
Not if I spec a 35 inseam. Haraki defaults to 1/2 inch decrease between knee and hem, however long the inseam is…
35" inseam it is then
giles, sorry. i meaned 0,2 inches from knee until the hem. it is nearly a straight cut. it is 0,5 for ex. with the S or the XHS.
@Giles:
that´s what i wanted to hear (even though the measurements not gonna work for me!)…
@hajduk:
it is 0,5 for ex. with the S or the XHS.
1/2" = 0.5…
De rien mec
Leave it blank.
The measurements look on point for a solid slim cut.
Another vote for "heavy ounce" great blend of JP / English and Boss Man.
@TresUnCool:
now that´s tresuncool…
sry, just had to do it
Definitely "heavy ounce". Not even a question…
@Chris:
A no-brainer indeed…
yep…
I like heavy ounce…
Heavy ounce sounds good. Are the thigh and hem measurements backwards for sz 32 & 33?
:)))
