IH-1955S

[Giles]

No plans for 25oz in these I am afraid…...I may reappraise the situation pending how the restock of the 21oz sell......

[Finn666]

^ you already know when it will be ready? (yeah I know about the difficulties u had with the MBB's and all! just asking.)

[Giles]

No idea.  I asked H for an estimated delivery date for all outstanding production orders yesterday…..

[Finn666]

ok, thanks!

[gbougard]

@Giles:

No plans for 25oz in these I am afraid…...I may reappraise the situation pending how the restock of the 21oz sell......

Reappraise, reappraise well, sir Giles! You know I'm in for two pairs.

[JDelage]

I'm super-excited to hear that those are going to be remade.  The one pair I have is my favorite - and quite frankly they're the most comfortable jeans I have and those that fit me the best.

[TinMan]

@Finn666:

good lad!
no 35´s though if that is correct?!…

You will not need 35 in these….  I am normally the bastard size 35 and size 34 in these are perfect...  In fact if I think they measured close to 35 post wear.

Tinman on the go...

[TinMan]

I am in for a pair fo sure

Tinman on the go…

[Finn666]

@TinMan:

You will not need 35 in these….  I am normally the bastard size 35 and size 34 in these are perfect...  In fact if I think they measured close to 35 post wear.

thanks for the info mate!…you got some fitpics of yours?

btw. G - the "see in shop" button is missing for this thread!

[Giles]

Thx Finn.  Fixed.

[trapp]

Really looking forward to these.

[trapp]

JDelage, do you own and wear the 634s as well? I find the 634s really comfortable already…but look forward to skyscraper-like high-rises of the 1955 cut.

[trapp]

I wish there was a place to try the 1955s on in the states.  I have size 33 and 34 in the 634s; the 33 fits my legs best and the 34 is more comfortable in the top block. Any recommendations for sizing the 1955? I'm guessing I could do either.

[seanocono]

Worst case, if you try on a pair and it doesn't fit the way you like, you can exchange for another size. It's like $30 to send back to the UK – well worth it to get the perfect fit.

[simonc]

trapp go up get a 34.

[JDelage]

@Trapp - The knee on the 634S is smaller than on the 1955.  I'm worried that would make them less comfortable.  I have fairly big thighs for my waist size and I would need to get a waist size bigger on the 634S to get knees 0.5" smaller than on the 1955.

[Giles]

@trapp:

I wish there was a place to try the 1955s on in the states.  I have size 33 and 34 in the 634s; the 33 fits my legs best and the 34 is more comfortable in the top block. Any recommendations for sizing the 1955? I'm guessing I could do either.

Drop Tinman a PM, he is an expert on 634S v 1955 cut…

[trapp]

Thanks for all the advice.

I'll probably go with the 34 for the legs and, if that doesn't seem right, exchange for a 33.

Super-excited about these!

[TinMan]

If you considering a 33 or 34…  I would go 34 I have had both and the 33 due to the taper was a little smal in the hem around the ankle.  These have a high rise and are ment to be worn above the hip bone with the front button just under the naval.  At least that is how I like to wear them.  Even though these are a full cut the silohuette appears slim due to the taper from knee to ankle.

I love my 634s they are one of the best Low to medium rise cuts, in fact I am going to get a size 35 in 634s.

The 1955s are not just a full cut 634S they wear different and have a different silohuette.  That being said they are one of favorites cuts in the IH line.  I never have to pull these up they ride perfect just above the hips and are very comfy...  I will try to post some pics if this helps people with fitting questions.

[davito]

Nice explanation of an authentic fit in these 55's. Looking forward to seeing your pix