The (Less intimidating) Watch Thread
-
If you really want a Rolex, and Maddy won't leave you for spending that much, then there's probably an argument for saving for one. Ultimately it'll work out cheaper than buying the intermediate Seiko, Tudor, etc.
The danger is that you'll then think, "I really want a Patek Nautilus…"
exactly..
-
Gonna post this for three reasons:
- the "less intimidating" thread is now talking about Pateks. That madness just needs to stop.
- pictures are always good.
- I am completely, self-destructively, pissing away the day at work, so why not?
This is an old eBay purchase- no idea of the specifics, other than its manual wind and reasonably accurate.
-
I love watches and they are a mandatory accessory for me, I feel naked if I leave the house without one. With that being said I am by no means a watch "snob" and my knowledge regarding movements, etc… is nonexistent. So this thread is perfect for me. I'm a sucker for chronograph's, metal bands, and in the 42mm to 48mm range. Two brands I like that fall under the less intimidating category are Tissot and Nixon.
Tissot
Nixon
-
It seems all gold watches aren't as popular these days but I think they look great when worn with the right outfit. Gold/Black is always a good combo.
-
I have an aversion to shiny gold things (or brass). I prefer shiny silver things
-
I have an aversion to shiny gold things (or brass). I prefer shiny silver things
That's a fair point. The Nixon posted above (which I do own) has a brushed/matte type of finish so it's not a shiny/gawdy type of gold so I agree with you. That watch actually draws lots of compliments too….. and I'm with you, I love shiny silver things.
-
I have an aversion to shiny gold things (or brass). I prefer shiny silver things
That's a fair point. The Nixon posted above (which I do own) has a brushed/matte type of finish so it's not a shiny/gawdy type of gold so I agree with you. That watch actually draws lots of compliments too….. and I'm with you, I love shiny silver things.
I can't quite put my finger on why I dislike gold or brass. Could be that they don't look good with my skin tone, which is partly why I can't wear yellow shirts. With belt buckles it technically doesn't matter since they'd be covered by my shirt anyways, but silver or nickel has always been a personal preference. The one exception i'd make for brass is for belt hooks/key fobs or whatever they're called, but I don't carry a back pocket wallet or use a rein so it's irrelevant
-
Oh I get it. I'm generally not a fan of yellow gold either and the only gold accessory I will wear is a gold watch. I think they can work great and stand out against the sea of silver watches worn by most. For some reason I only wear it in the winter and it really pops when worn with certain colors (black, burgundy, navy, white…)
-
I generally have an aversion to all shiny things, and jewelry in general… I don't even have a wedding ring.....
That's partly why I really like the look of the Hamilton Khaki Field line... Very understated, but can be dressed up or down. But, admittedly, my favorite has a polished bezel, whilst the rest of the case is brushed.
-
Gonna post this for three reasons:
- the "less intimidating" thread is now talking about Pateks. That madness just needs to stop.
Fake Texan keeping it real [emoji1]
@UnTucked and @manufc10 last posts contain some great looking watches that are more in my ballpark. While I understand the attraction of the watches Graeme compares, and it was a great post, I’m just not “there” yet. By that I mean that while I appreciate the beauty of the Patek I’m just not ready to spend that much IH money on a watch that I won’t appreciate in the way it deserves.
-
that watch is a beauty @Chris
i was a Seiko 5 whore for a moment and now I have suddenly decided I do not like watches with days & dates
(which is insane because i actually am one of the few folks who cannot bring a phone to work and so day and date function is useful for me) -
@UnTucked you really love your earth tones don't you
-
Steinhart…..
- I've promised myself that my next watch won't be bronze... But this piece is GORGEOUS!
https://www.steinhartwatches.de/en/marine-officer-bronze.html
–---The stainless model is beautiful, as well:
https://www.steinhartwatches.de/en/marine-watch/marine-officer-beige.html
-
I love watches and they are a mandatory accessory for me, I feel naked if I leave the house without one. With that being said I am by no means a watch "snob" and my knowledge regarding movements, etc… is nonexistent. So this thread is perfect for me. I'm a sucker for chronograph's, metal bands, and in the 42mm to 48mm range. Two brands I like that fall under the less intimidating category are Tissot and Nixon.
I rate Tissot, largely because of their success in chronometry competitions. These used to be run regularly, as a way of testing watch accuracy, but were killed off by development of quartz. They were revived in 2009, and have been run every two years after that.
There's a tourbillon category, which is full of the sort of watches that @Chris has banned me from mentioning in this thread, and a classic category, which has been won by Tissot in 2011, 2013, and 2015. (I don't know if there was a competition last year.)
In 2011, a Tissot Le Locle Chronometer won with 764 points out of 1000. The runner up, on 488 points, was an FP Journe Chronomètre Souverain, which is from a boutique brand run by one of the greatest living watchmakers.
Jack Forster, who writes for Hodinkee, asked whether the Tissot Le Locle was the world's most interesting watch. I'm inclined to agree with him, though I don't like the gold plating on that example.
