IH-1955S

[Finn666]

@Giles:

Just measured a pair of 34's.  Here are the measurements followed by IH-634S measurements for comparative purposes:

Waist                34.0          33.9
Front Rise          13.5          10.9
Rear Rise            16.75        14.8
Thigh                13.8          12.9
Knee                  10.0          9.4
Hem                  8.0            8.9
Leg                    37.0          35.1

these sound like some fine ass measurements to me…

sanforized right?

[TinMan]

@Finn666:

@Giles:

Just measured a pair of 34's.  Here are the measurements followed by IH-634S measurements for comparative purposes:

Waist                34.0          33.9
Front Rise          13.5          10.9
Rear Rise            16.75        14.8
Thigh                13.8          12.9
Knee                  10.0          9.4
Hem                  8.0            8.9
Leg                    37.0          35.1

these sound like some fine ass measurements to me…

sanforized right?

They are perfect fro me!! I am glad for the bigger thigh. I was just double checking, when I should known better.

[TinMan]

Wish I could wear these to work, but the mucky mucks just introduced a no jean policy last week!!  can you say bullshit, IH Forum should I quit?  jk,  I need income to buy more IH gear.  The new policy does suck ASS….. though!

[Finn666]

^one advantage of still being a student, but that`s about it :)…

dunno if i`m right, but from the measurements and all i think this is more of a 66 cut, when comparing to the ones from Levis!?...

[beautiful_FrEaK]

yeah the taper is quite strong (more than I would have expected on a '55 cut). but the highish rise is more suitable for the '55 than the '66

[Finn666]

well i actually thought more cuz of the taper as of the high rise…so this is a combination of the 55 and 66 cut i`d say

[bluetooth]

the 66s were lower in the rise and slimmer in the thigh  with a hem of  8-8.5 hem the 55 s were about the same as thesse measurements but the hem was abou 9.5  and most of the 66s  around over here(portsmouth) had zips

[Finn666]

well i just was talking bout the measurements…not the hardware! thanks though

[TinMan]

I know one thing!! they are going to be AWESOME!! I will try and get up pics when they arrive! since they were the first pair sold…........  ok I will stop bragging now.

[daveo]

Awfully interested in these…interested in a fit pic compared to the 634S.

[Giles]

Well, we can argue the toss, but this pattern is a 55.  I'm not telling you where I got the pattern, but it is a 55…..

[jimmy]

^ hmmm intriguing please pm if your willing to share. I've got a 55 patten that i worked out of my two vintage pair and a brand new pair of sugarcane 55 as reference.

Now I have to get a pair of IH to compare. Are you selling the ones with aero arc?

[Giles]

Cant do - sorry.

http://www.ironheart.co.uk/forum/index.php?topic=1789.msg99014#msg99014

[jimmy]

I hate you…......

I know there is the normal arc version your selling G but are we able to get the aero though u or are those from aero only. promise I just read the whole tread before asking again, the answer is just not clear to me .....sorry

[TinMan]

the model on website looks great. the jeans look good to  ;D….. is the model wearing his normal size 33?

[Giles]

Aero arc version, just from Aero

[Giles]

They are up on the site:

http://www.ironheart.co.uk/index.php?main_page=product_info&cPath=1&products_id=230

[TinMan]

are you wearing 33 on the site….. they look awesome on you!!

[Giles]

TinMan - page updated to answer your question…...

[TinMan]

just saw it sorry…..