IH-1955S

TinMan

I just commented to Paula. We have sold none of those coin puches since the first flurry when they arrived. Then, out of nowhere today, we sell 2…....

I also want to order the tan long wallet when it is back in stock… I think it will work well with the bigger pocket on these.

TinMan

@Giles:

Just measured a pair of 34's. Here are the measurements followed by IH-634S measurements for comparative purposes:

Waist 34.0 33.9
Front Rise 13.5 10.9
Rear Rise 16.75 14.8
Thigh 13.8 12.9
Knee 10.0 9.4
Hem 8.0 8.9
Leg 37.0 35.1

I thought the sample size 34 had something like a 13.25 or 13.5 thigh? no matter I can not wait to get thes in my grubby mits!!

Giles

^ They may have done, but whilst the sample pair were tagged 34, I think they actually measured 33, so I asked Haraki to get the production run to be tag = actual…...

Finn666

@Giles:

Just measured a pair of 34's. Here are the measurements followed by IH-634S measurements for comparative purposes:

Waist 34.0 33.9
Front Rise 13.5 10.9
Rear Rise 16.75 14.8
Thigh 13.8 12.9
Knee 10.0 9.4
Hem 8.0 8.9
Leg 37.0 35.1

these sound like some fine ass measurements to me…

sanforized right?

TinMan

@Finn666:

@Giles:

Just measured a pair of 34's. Here are the measurements followed by IH-634S measurements for comparative purposes:

Waist 34.0 33.9
Front Rise 13.5 10.9
Rear Rise 16.75 14.8
Thigh 13.8 12.9
Knee 10.0 9.4
Hem 8.0 8.9
Leg 37.0 35.1

these sound like some fine ass measurements to me…

sanforized right?

They are perfect fro me!! I am glad for the bigger thigh. I was just double checking, when I should known better.

TinMan

Wish I could wear these to work, but the mucky mucks just introduced a no jean policy last week!! can you say bullshit, IH Forum should I quit? jk, I need income to buy more IH gear. The new policy does suck ASS….. though!

Finn666

^one advantage of still being a student, but that`s about it :)…

dunno if i`m right, but from the measurements and all i think this is more of a 66 cut, when comparing to the ones from Levis!?...

beautiful_FrEaK

yeah the taper is quite strong (more than I would have expected on a '55 cut). but the highish rise is more suitable for the '55 than the '66

Finn666

well i actually thought more cuz of the taper as of the high rise…so this is a combination of the 55 and 66 cut i`d say

bluetooth

the 66s were lower in the rise and slimmer in the thigh with a hem of 8-8.5 hem the 55 s were about the same as thesse measurements but the hem was abou 9.5 and most of the 66s around over here(portsmouth) had zips

Finn666

well i just was talking bout the measurements…not the hardware! thanks though

TinMan

I know one thing!! they are going to be AWESOME!! I will try and get up pics when they arrive! since they were the first pair sold…........ ok I will stop bragging now.

daveo

Awfully interested in these…interested in a fit pic compared to the 634S.

Giles

Well, we can argue the toss, but this pattern is a 55. I'm not telling you where I got the pattern, but it is a 55…..

jimmy

^ hmmm intriguing please pm if your willing to share. I've got a 55 patten that i worked out of my two vintage pair and a brand new pair of sugarcane 55 as reference.

Now I have to get a pair of IH to compare. Are you selling the ones with aero arc?

Giles

Cant do - sorry.

http://www.ironheart.co.uk/forum/index.php?topic=1789.msg99014#msg99014

jimmy

I hate you…......

I know there is the normal arc version your selling G but are we able to get the aero though u or are those from aero only. promise I just read the whole tread before asking again, the answer is just not clear to me .....sorry

TinMan

the model on website looks great. the jeans look good to ;D….. is the model wearing his normal size 33?

Giles

Aero arc version, just from Aero

Giles

They are up on the site:

http://www.ironheart.co.uk/index.php?main_page=product_info&cPath=1&products_id=230

Iron Heart Fall/Winter 2025 Collection Preview - Now Live

IH-1955S