Watches - another OCD problem
-
had a chance to try on the yellow gold and silver Tudors. pleasantly surprised with how good it looks. idiotic me forgot to take a picture to show you all. I'll try and get them again..
-
Damn @Giles! That's one of my fave modern day watches. So, so lovely. How do you like it?
-
It was my dream watch for years, then I was offered a really good deal on it. Had to sell a few body parts…
I put the Nato on it last week, in the process I found out that the strap bars are screw-in lug bars, so I have just ordered a 0.9mm Allen key and some Tamiya thread lock (and spare lug-bars and screws in case I strip the thread), so I can put a non-Nato on it....
-
The No Rad edition? That’s one hell of a score, congrats!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
went back to take another look at the Tudor black bay but the gold is no longer on display. wonder if they've already sold it..
for now, the silver. They had another one with the fabric strap but that's gone too. this model comes with the leather strap. the grey dial and bezel does look good and complement the silver case well. not sure if anyone can tell the difference from a far between silver and stainless steel but the finishes are completely different.
-
Looking good, I’m wearing my older ETA powered “Smiley” BB today [emoji2]
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
Looking good, I’m wearing my older ETA powered “Smiley” BB today [emoji2]
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Snap!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
Not a great pic, but it’s a great watch @Cutlasshound
-
The Black Bay in silver looks good. It sounds like it won't tarnish, which is a bit of a shame, as I like the idea of a what that develops a patina.
Zenith have done a time only watch and a chronograph in silver. In a recent interview, Julien Tornare (the CEO) said that they considered stabilising the case so it wouldn't tarnish, but then they decided not to. They wanted a case that aged with use.
I don't recall seeing the silver chronograph before, but it looks quite good.
-
There are silver alloys that do not tarnish, e.g., argentium.
Silver is a different beast from bronze, IMHO. Bronze really takes on a multitude of hues as it patinates. Silver starts from being the whitest metal and turns grey, and then near black. It doesn't patina in a very interesting manner.
-
yeah. the sales staff and I were having a chat about the silver. it really comes down to personal preference at the end of the day. I did mention that it was uncommon to have silver on watches and you don't see it too often, like the zenith @Graeme posted. they did mention that Tudor has added alloys to make sure it wouldn't tarnish. I also did mention that I do like my silver ageing/ oxidising as shown by the goros I was wearing.
@Anesthetist that is one of the best colour ways out there of the BB
-
I think more than the aesthetics of silver oxidation, I'd be concerned with the wear and tear. Silver's pretty soft and watches get banged around a lot. Ok, maybe that's just mine, but still.
Of course, gold is even softer, and that's been used for watches since forever, so maybe I'm completely off base.
-
The advantage of platinum is that, unlike gold, it does not wear out. The molecules just shift but are not lost. Anyway, it's heavier than gold. Wearing platinum is said to be incomparable.
-
The platinum Rolex (with the light blue dial) are super heavy.
@Eisenherz - Can you give precisions on what you wrote reg. Pl vs Au? I'm not sure I understand. Thanks.
-
Gold loses atoms while wearing it rubs off, so to speak. This does not happen with platinum. Here the atoms are just shifting back and forth while wearing. They do not leave their atomic compound. At some point (in 1000 years) gold disappeared through wear, platinum never. Is that too much physics? Sorry!
