Watches - another OCD problem
-
I'll have to disagree about 4:30 being a bad place for the date on a diver in all cases, for two reasons: first, if done correctly, it becomes inconspicuous and fades into the background until you are looking for it (the FF does this well, but the FF Bathyscaphe does not), and second, particularly on divers, it minimizes the disruption of the lume pattern. One easy way to mitigate this is to place the date at 3 (or 6… I guess...) on a lumed disc or ring that matches the color of the other indices (though I'm not sure whether this is ever done). Some have tackled this by having an abbreviated index at 3 to make room for the date window. And in the end, if you're simply missing an index at 3 (or less desirably at 6) in lieu of a date window, you can still read the asymmetric lume.
The biggest crime in date windows aside from misalignment is apertures that show dates before and after the indexed date. That looks like shit and needlessly complicates the read. Does the wearer not know what dates come before or after a given date ("Shit, what day was yesterday? I better check my watch. I see that today is the 9th. Ah, there it is. The 8th. Yesterday was the 8th.") To wit:
or even more hideously,
Also, for whatever reason I really dislike showing the day of the week unless the watch is an annual or perpetual calendar. I guess I'm a fan of sneaking the date in there, if at all.
-
Watch shopping in St Thomas was mind numbingly awesome. Pretty much every major house was represented within a 3 block radius. I finally got to try on the Bulgari Octo ultrathin and even with the price tag it was hard to take off.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
I'll have to avoid St Thomas @Anesthetist . It could prove an expensive destination!
The Octo Finissimo is rather good. I particularly like the black ceramic version.
As for date windows, I think that the Glasshütte SeaQ does it best on a divers watch.
-
I like that. Completely unobtrusive but it’s there when you need it.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
Counterpoint: if they didn't render numerals at various angles on tachymeter scales they would look pretty bad.
Love this Blancpain dress watch
-
That Blancpain is perfection
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
Yes, the 5035. It has been replaced by the 5146 which is a couple of mm larger, but it has a moonphase which I think is a complete waste of time, and it costs more than the 5035….
Agreed with the moonphase… I don't know much about Patek except that they are superexpensive, but that seems to be a reasonable price for a golden high end watch, right?
-
I sold my only Patek recently so really owe myself one at some point, don't I????
IMO, Patek represents the pinnacle of watch-making. At this price-point, what the watch is made of really has little bearing on the price of the watch. If they made it in steel, that would probably be the one I'd go for
-
I sold my only Patek recently so really owe myself one at some point, don't I????
IMO, Patek represents the pinnacle of watch-making. At this price-point, what the watch is made of really has little bearing on the price of the watch. If they made it in steel, that would probably be the one I'd go for
If it were made of steel it would be more expensive!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
I like the moon phase, particularly the way Patek does it. I have zero use for it but just enjoy the difficulty involved in fitting another complication into the space. Likewise I have no use for a chronograph but would love to pick up a Speedy or Daytina.
-
The 9 in the date window doesn't look centered on that PP. Lovely watch otherwise
-
My lovely Mare Nostrum will be going in 2020.
