Watches - another OCD problem

[Segovia]

Been looking for a cool dive watch for a while, and this one hit the spot for me. Steinhart Ocean Titanium.

[den1mhead]

^lovely time piece^ http://www.steinhartwatches.de/en/OCEAN-Titanium-500-Premium,974.html

[Isogorth]

Old Heuer 1000 I've had for a few years

[Chris]

That one looks well loved.  We rarely see watches around here with mileage on them.  I like it.

[Black Orchid]

It may not look like it but my GMT Master II has 25 years of mileage on it 

[louisbosco]

beautiful.. love the 16750.. cant believe it's been that long.

[Snowy]

@Black:

It may not look like it but my GMT Master II has 25 years of mileage on it 

If I wasn't already sold on a GMT Master II, that did it!

[Graeme]

Sticking to the Rolex love-in, there's a barely dressed up press release an article at aBlogToWatch announcing that Rolex will be regulating and certifying all movements to run at an accuracy of between -2 and +2 seconds per day. This is more stringent than Omega's 0 / +5 seconds accuracy.

So if you're looking for an excuse to buy one..

[Graeme]

Since @Anesthetist is into small watches, I think that this 33 mm Patek will appeal. It's a limited edition with a stainless case and porcelain dial.

The advert's on Timezone, whilst Hodinkee has a write-up. It's up for grabs at $11,500 with box but no papers.

[Anesthetist]

It's beautiful and a rarity with the stainless case! I'm 35 now and it's my goal to have one on my wrist by my 40th bday. Thanks for the info, I love reading about hard to find goodies like this!

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Chris]

@Graeme:

Sticking to the Rolex love-in, there's a barely dressed up press release an article at aBlogToWatch announcing that Rolex will be regulating and certifying all movements to run at an accuracy of between -2 and +2 seconds per day. This is more stringent than Omega's 0 / +5 seconds accuracy.

So if you're looking for an excuse to buy one..

I wonder if that means Rolex will be raising prices.  Wait, what was I thinking?  Of course they will.

[Giles]

@Anesthetist:

I'm 35 now and it's my goal to have one on my wrist by my 40th bday.

Sill have my small gold 1954 Calatrava in the safe doing nothing….

[Qinhan]

@Graeme:

Since @Anesthetist is into small watches, I think that this 33 mm Patek will appeal. It's a limited edition with a stainless case and porcelain dial.

The advert's on Timezone, whilst Hodinkee has a write-up. It's up for grabs at $11,500 with box but no papers.

I'm not usually a huge PP fan but that really is beautiful.

[Anesthetist]

@Giles:

@Anesthetist:

I'm 35 now and it's my goal to have one on my wrist by my 40th bday.

Sill have my small gold 1954 Calatrava in the safe doing nothing….

Think my balls will fit in the safe too? I will need to hide them from my wife if I buy it anytime soon!

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Snowy]

^If you take the watch out, there'll certainly be room for a pair of balls. Fair trade for a lovely PP too

[Giles]

@Qinhan:

@Graeme:

Since @Anesthetist is into small watches, I think that this 33 mm Patek will appeal. It's a limited edition with a stainless case and porcelain dial.

The advert's on Timezone, whilst Hodinkee has a write-up. It's up for grabs at $11,500 with box but no papers.

I'm not usually a huge PP fan but that really is beautiful.

Your wife would probably love mine….

[Qinhan]

Sadly, she prefers watches with a more complex design.  Hence my failure to get her interested in anything by Nomos.

[Graeme]

@Qinhan you're missing a trick.

Buy her a Patek, and when she says she doesn't like it, you get to wear it. That way you don't get into trouble for spending too much on a watch.

[Qinhan]

In my family we call that the "Homer bowling ball trick".

[Qinhan]

Random Snowflake shot…