IH-301S

[Finn666]

^now i got it :)…thx for your time G.

[Giles]

Phew….....

[Finn666]

hahaha

[Seul]

@Giles:

Phew….....

Cosigned, the entire fecking forum.

[madmonday]

Giles I feel for you.

You know how long I've dealt with this

[Finn666]

just cuz i was the one bringin the question down to paper/or on the page…:D
i think there were many other guys (you as well Mr.Piggy) which were also confused about this whole warp and weft thing and the different dye methods and all...so be thankful you bastards

[Seul]

It's the 301 cut - I'm quite indifferent about it… But I was just joking lad... 

[madmonday]

nope had no such questions, & i'm pretty good about making an ass of myself 

[Seul]

@monday:

i'm pretty good about making an ass of myself 

Comes as natural as breathing to me.

[Finn666]

check my sig. guys ;)…

[barun]

new 301's.  Better pics to come, I promise

[madmonday]

looks like a comfortable fit from this angle.

[barun]

They are comfortable.  They could use an inch in the thigh but that will come.  I need to experiment with wearing them cuffed vs. uncuffed and all that stuff though

[derivative666]

Looking good Barun. Are you happy with them?

[barun]

very, thanks a lot

[derivative666]

My pleasure

[barun]

I was just inspecting the details on these jeans and needless to say, they are pretty cool.  The stitching is way thicker that the other pairs of IH's that I have.  Does anyone know if there is a reason that they don't show the selvedge seam on the inside seam?  Maybe they made these out of left over material?

[jacoavlu]

it has to do with the tapered slim cut
with such a taper you cannot preserve the selvage line

[madmonday]

which i bought before, than they came out with the 666s that are selvedge through & through & are pretty slim.

it's crazy insane . . .

[jacoavlu]

well I think the cut of the 301s tapers to the hem on both sides of the leg (medial and lateral)
whereas maybe the 666 achieves the slim leg only with the taper on the inner (medial) aspect