Photograph and Camera talk
-
Wow, just wow! I must say with the exception of the last one (a bit too bland for my taste - no offense), all of the others are amazing! Something straight out of a magazine.
-
Thanks all…....the pic with the Harpist, a lot of work was done to it, I'll try to find the original, but in the background pretty much surrounding her, there was a speaker on a tripod and wiring all over the place.....PS is your best friend, haha.
The last pic, I kind of went overboard with the Hue/Saturation, but still looks cool.
Some Fish pics (RIP to both):
Cris.
-
Agreed with PS is your best friend. I just learned that if you clone stamp one image and you still have it clone stamped and go to another image you can transfer that image.. Which is what I did today
Honestly PS is awesome.
-
^Both are sick cars, but too bad I hate BMWs and Lexus's. To me Lexus's are like $0.10 millionaire cars, people who are rich but who really aren't. That is just me though, if you have ever been to LI people act that way, trying to drive on LI is insane as well.
-
Hey I'm not trying to get flamed…......... but could anyone recommend a good camera make / model. I'm an architect and I'm tired of using shitty cameras to document my work. I take allot of pics in the field from start to finish of various projects, so i can have my boss absorb some of the cost since it is necessary for my work. Im thinking something in the $500 to $900 range.
Any recommendations would be appreciated, since i really don't know anything.
Thanks -
Hey I'm not trying to get flamed…......... but could anyone recommend a good camera make / model. I'm an architect and I'm tired of using shitty cameras to document my work. I take allot of pics in the field from start to finish of various projects, so i can have my boss absorb some of the cost since it is necessary for my work. Im thinking something in the $500 to $900 range.
Any recommendations would be appreciated, since i really don't know anything.
ThanksWell, I wouldn't worry too much about a great body, but certainly invest in the lens. I know that a dedicated lens for architecture is a tilt-shift lens, but you could also get a wide-angle lens. As for a body depending on what you are more comfortable with (nikon or Canon), I would first test out which bodies you would wanna test. Personally I would recommend a Canon body as they have the cheapest tilt shift lens. For a body I would opt out for a rebel series, but I would also check out some nikon bodies as well.
Got my 50 1.2L lens today! It is a bit soft @ 1.2, so I think I may have to get it tweaked by Canon.
-
lax I wouldn't assume your 50L needs adjustment
that's just what you're gonna see with super thin depth of field when shot wide opendo some test shots with a yard stick laying on the floor directed away
focus on the 18 and shoot at multiple f stops
you'll get a sense for the DOF at each stop -
Well, I understand DOF perfectly, and know how it works etc..etc.. Anyways, here is what I mean. It was a relatively low shutter speed, but still I don't think it would make a halo like this? A few others were like this.
It looks to be very soft instead of sharp.
-
Yeah, I plan on taking it on vacation with me first to really test it. But if in fact a lot of my images are soft, I am going to have to exchange it for a different once, which would suck cause I don't think I wanna let this lens off my camera. But, here is an HDR shot using 3 exposures.. Just as a test.. I must say the sunburst effect (whatever you wanna call it), is pretty damn cool…
-
that sunburst happens more as you close down the aperture. if you happen to want it to be less..open up a little. i personally love it but sometimes it's overwhelming depending what you're shooting.
as for your halo effect. is it happening when you shoot anything else? because that may be from a slow shutter speed. you need to shoot something with the camera on tripod with no potential motion) that thing is not a good test subject, and it's hanging therefore has potential motion.
as for being soft at 1.2…most lenses with that large of an aperture aren't super sharp wide open..close down to 1.8 or 2.0 and see if there's a huge difference.
