IH-1955S
-
Good to hear that, Giles. I figured you'd sell the same arcs.
-
I know I'm of the minority but I like the A. Can't wait for more press on these to roll out.
-
I am completely with Haraki on this one…
nope, IH has never been a repro in terms of cut. Basically - the only thing that would qualify them for the title is manufacturing standards
It is a well known fact 55's are the greatest cut ever, but hey, the future shall decide 55's cut or beatle busters, but I'm pretty sure these will be the biggest selling jeans for IH
My first post
-
They're going to have a long way to go before they'll catch up to the 634. A very long way.
-
Great fit on these, Giles. One of your best so far. (I beg to differ on the"fact" that the "55 is the best cut ever", though :P)
The Arcs are nice, too. Is a (maybe non-red) tab impossible due to possible law suits? seems to be no big issue lately. -
I am completely with Haraki on this one…
nope, IH has never been a repro in terms of cut. Basically - the only thing that would qualify them for the title is manufacturing standards
It is a well known fact 55's are the greatest cut ever, but hey, the future shall decide 55's cut or beatle busters, but I'm pretty sure these will be the biggest selling jeans for IH
My first post
yeah, dont know about that… 1947 outsells '55 quite often and also get re-pro'd more often. but hey, that doesnt mean it isnt still a great cut.
-
It is a well known fact 55's are the greatest cut ever, but hey, the future shall decide 55's cut or beatle busters, but I'm pretty sure these will be the biggest selling jeans for IH
My first post
first post. excellent. 55 isn´t nearly as popular as 47 or 66, but hey, who even cares ?
and btw - having different cuts is one of the blessings of IH growing. so many different kind of shapes and legs out there that chances are you will find the one that suits you best. simple as that, and not a competitionWe can do anything
http://bybeatle.com -
I'm definitely on for 1 pair of those… Will we spoiled customers be treated to an OD'd version of those??? I am asking because I need to know how big my next closet might need to be.
-
It is a well known fact 55's are the greatest cut ever, but hey, the future shall decide 55's cut or beatle busters, but I'm pretty sure these will be the biggest selling jeans for IH
My first post
Ah Beatle since you are self confessed Non Retro fan (and the key word your looking for here is Vintage) I can tell you that the '47 was floored in design with tighter thighs and narrow seat (which some may like) but lets stick to the facts shall we since you are tossing them out. Allow me. The 47's were only in circulation for seven years and gangs and rock n roll had not yet formed as US infantry had only been back for two years the jeans were not truly tested on a the youth market. It was with the '55 that the cut was pretty much assembled and tested by the most influential figures of the 20th century and it lasted 11 years, and it was Levis highest selling jean of all time bar none. If sales figures are not your thing, note the 66's only lasted three years until they were cancelled, this was due to Levis coming in late into the mod scene with a tight straight leg cut and by that stage in London the wide hem was already born and blossoming. The 55's were highly sought after from collectors from about 1977 and onwards a pair of deadstock '66 may fetch $400 today whereas a deadstock pair of xx55's will fetch in excess of $3000. Hope this helps.
first post. excellent. 55 isn´t nearly as popular as 47 or 66, but hey, who even cares ?
and btw - having different cuts is one of the blessings of IH growing. so many different kind of shapes and legs out there that chances are you will find the one that suits you best. simple as that, and not a competition -
back to our previously scheduled program:
Waist 34
FR 13
RR 16.5
Thigh 13.25
Knee 10
Cuff 8.25
Inseam 34.5Lined rear pockets, 4 button fly, 21oz selvedge…...
***beauty isn't it
& more importantly any that are interested can get a pair in the not too distant future. . . maybe Tuesday will surprise me
