IHSH-62-IND - 12oz Wabash Western Shirt - Indigo
-
New classic wabash & camo.
-
Hello all.
And a great shirt it is, and very happy with my recent collection
-
Nice fit @indigohuntsman. I think I said this on the Welcome thread, but you’ve chosen some stone cold classics to start your IH wardrobe with. Thanks for posting.
-
Nice fit @indigohuntsman. I think I said this on the Welcome thread, but you’ve chosen some stone cold classics to start your IH wardrobe with. Thanks for posting.
Thanks again neph93.
I always wanted the 666s, but luckily I came across them in the Outlet, and snatched them quickly.
Just love the smokey raw denim smell, coming of these jeans
The jacket is a absolute classic and in fit.
The Western Wabash, well say no more, and thanks again guys, for all the help and advice -
Favorite shirt nowadays. We are at the Japanese garden in Descanso Gardens.
-
Thanks, @neph93. Coming from the Wabash master that's a nice compliment!
-
@Indigohuntsman that shirt looks amazing but very long on you.
I had a similar issue with a Nine Lives shirt that bothered me for 6 months of wear. I decided to take it in and get it shortened by about 2.5” and couldn’t be happier with the results.
Cheers and enjoy.
-
@Indigohuntsman that shirt looks amazing but very long on you.
I had a similar issue with a Nine Lives shirt that bothered me for 6 months of wear. I decided to take it in and get it shortened by about 2.5” and couldn’t be happier with the results.
Cheers and enjoy.
Hello and thank you.
Well the tail end, may be a bit on the long side, but I'm fine with it.
And there could be possible shrinkage, after it's had a soak -
It will loose length with a hot wash or repeated washing. The ends of the shirt will also curl, shortening the length further.
Thanks again neph93
-
After the first warm soak
-
An experience I'd like to share about this shirt is that if you wash it twice at 90 degrees celsius, you'll get a significant amount of shrinkage out of the sleeve, front and back length.
Edit due to expressing myself unclear the first time: I don't recommend going by what the website states regarding the washing temperature if you wish to significantly shrink your shirt to your desired fit.
Perhaps it just worked in my case and it worked out perfectly which would be somehow odd I guess. Either way, I'm super happy with the second wash shrinking my shirt in sleeve, front and back length. I recommend the same to people who want to shrink their shirts - It definitely works.
Here are some photos of the results/ fit:
-
@doguhanca We use 30c as a recommendation based on countless experiences of washing at this temperature which results in minimal shrinkage.
Washing a fabric at three times this heat is bound to yield different results
-
@neph93 I have a different experience with 90 degrees celsius shrinking most of the IH stuff I've owned. I thought I'd share this experience for the people that have tried washing at 30 or 60 degrees which is pretty much useless if you want to get out the full shrinkage. Even washing once at 90 degrees celsius wasn't as successful as washing it twice at 90 degrees celsius. Could be useful for people that give up too easily on their IH and sell it again due to "not enough shrinkage".
@AdamJ I think I expressed myself a bit wrong in my original statement, sorry for that. I understand that 30 degrees is just a guideline. My actual point was to show that there is an efficient alternative as to shrinking the 62-Ind. As said above, washing at 90 degrees celsius once might be the point where people give up on their shirts since they haven't gotten enough shrinkage out of it. By sharing this experience, perhaps I can give hope to the ones that can actually shrink it further after a second wash. I have nothing against the guideline of washing at 30 degrees at all if you wish not to shrink your shirt any further. However, since I've read that most people do actually wish to shrink their shirts - due to the long sleeve, front or back length that is - which is why I thought I'd share my little experiment. After all: "It's not an exact science", right?
Edit: I have fixed my original statement above in order to avoid confusions
