Iron Heart Products - What do you think we should make?
-
Personal preferences, no doubt. I would prefer to see Giles sell the tees he has already made, which are perfectly suitable as "undershirts", rather than hear people say, "what about this idea?" or "how about this instead…" or "if they were only lighter", and then not buy tees
-
My only concern with the IH t's I've tried is they are much too bulky and not really a "fitted" fit, especially in the sleeves. I'm fine with the 6.5oz part, although I'd be fine with lighter weight as well (I never thought I'd be all that interested in a 14oz denim from Iron Heart but I'm LOVING my new 14oz 666's). But to function as an undershirt, it should be more of a slim, fitted cut, especially in the sleeves.
-
I'm definitely in the heavy-weight minority, but I would love to see more people in Iron Heart Tees on a daily basis. I'd love to see what lightweight magic the crew can come up with to satisfy the need for lighter, stretchier, more fitted IHT's. I'm all in, regardless…
-
My only concern with the IH t's I've tried is they are much too bulky and not really a "fitted" fit, especially in the sleeves. I'm fine with the 6.5oz part, although I'd be fine with lighter weight as well (I never thought I'd be all that interested in a 14oz denim from Iron Heart but I'm LOVING my new 14oz 666's). But to function as an undershirt, it should be more of a slim, fitted cut, especially in the sleeves.
This.
I don't care about the weight. It just seems like loopwheeled shirts are made for people with bellies.
Enviado desde mi iPhone utilizando Tapatalk
-
I love the 7,5 oz Shirts and wear a lot of them, but for a undershirt I'd prefer a slimmer cut and lighter fabric as well. I wouldn't want to wear those heavy current ones under a business Shirt (but then I don't want to anyway). So, I don't ask for new Tees, but can understand the request.
-
I wasn't going to chime in on this T shirt debate, but a couple of comments echo my own experience. I've bought various iterations of printed IH T's for the last 5 years, and love the heavyweight fabric, but have noticed that the changes in fit have made them less suitable for me, and it's principally the tight neck and lack of taper that makes them wear a bit oddly on me. I've bought 6 RMC T's, (the basic 2 pack undershirts), and love the fit, but would love it more if IH could do something in a similar vein.
-
I remember the first ever sample of the IHD-01 was made with the old 18oz, but the factory couldn't make a production run. Maybe they can now?
http://www.ironheart.co.uk/forum/index.php?topic=282.msg55078#msg55078
-
The more I see these engineers pant releases, the more I want one….. Only in a non-wabash.
-
I would love to see a corduroy, sherpa lined Type I jacket (without a buckle). You basically only see type IIIs like this but I think a type 1 (maybe w/ hidden pockets, almost like Visvim - very unlikely, I know) would be awesome.
-
I would love to see a corduroy, sherpa lined Type I jacket (without a buckle). You basically only see type IIIs like this but I think a type 1 (maybe w/ hidden pockets, almost like Visvim - very unlikely, I know) would be awesome.
Cool idea
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
Cordovan notebook cover, preferably for Field Notes
-
I would love to see a corduroy, sherpa lined Type I jacket (without a buckle). You basically only see type IIIs like this but I think a type 1 (maybe w/ hidden pockets, almost like Visvim - very unlikely, I know) would be awesome.
Actually, seeing the below pic of a leather type I makes me want an OD denim version (or just black).
-
14oz OD version ion the works….
Can't wait to see a sample of this!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
14oz OD version ion the works….
Awesome news! Might finally find my dream type I! If it's coming with a cinch, would you/is it possible to have some of them sewn up without it? From what I've seen, this doesn't really require a significant pattern change (I may be very wrong, though!).
-
My only concern with the IH t's I've tried is they are much too bulky and not really a "fitted" fit, especially in the sleeves. I'm fine with the 6.5oz part, although I'd be fine with lighter weight as well (I never thought I'd be all that interested in a 14oz denim from Iron Heart but I'm LOVING my new 14oz 666's). But to function as an undershirt, it should be more of a slim, fitted cut, especially in the sleeves.
Seconding this.
I'm aware that as a really skinny build, I'm in the minority of IH wearers, but this is a consistent issue I've had with looking at pretty much any IH shirting–I have slightly broad shoulders for my size, but otherwise need a pretty severe taper from the shoulders down to properly fit just about anything (only "shirting" I own is the IHTB-01 and even that needed a tuck-in from the pits down so I don't give off that shirt-mannequin appearance).
On the bright side, the shirting money can go towards another pair of jeans--it's all in how you view it, I guess.
-
I would never steer anyone away from IronHeart, but you sound like you could be a model for FlatHead.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
