• Home
    • Recent
    • Calendar
    • Register
    • Login
    Iron Heart Forum
    Iron Heart Forum

    Iron Heart Fall/Winter 2025 Collection Preview - Now Live

    Iron Heart Products - What do you think we should make?

    Future and Planned Products
    802
    15.0k
    6.3m
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • rocketR
      rocket
      Joined:
      • japanese silk bandanas

      • light weight white summer / under t-shirts (fitted cut), could be sold in a double pack for both customer and retailer satisfaction

      • new tote bags, like the IH-TOTE, simple, inexpensive and usefull

      rocketrocksrox 🤙🏼🤙🏾

      It's all humbug, like everywhere
      R.I.P. Geo

      last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • xtcclassicX
        xtcclassic
        啓蒙家
        Joined:

        @rocket:

        light weight white summer / under t-shirts (fitted cut), could be sold in a double pack for both customer and retailer satisfaction

        YES

        last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • DrBabyhorseD
          DrBabyhorse
          Joined:

          @rocket:

          • light weight white summer / under t-shirts (fitted cut), could be sold in a double pack for both customer and retailer satisfaction

          • new tote bags, like the IH-TOTE, simple, inexpensive and usefull

          Yes!

          Enviado desde mi iPhone utilizando Tapatalk

          last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • neph93N
            neph93
            見習いボス
            Joined:

            @Jordonf9:

            Any thoughts about sleeveless shirts? Not exactly a tank top cut, but more cut the sleeves off a tshirt, perfect for hot ass summer days?

            Yes to this and to tank tops but alas, "the computer says "no"". Or it did when I suggested this a year or so ago.

            «Stevie Heighway on the wing!
            We had dreams, and songs to sing…»

            • Dame Vera Lynn
            last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • T
              Tidal
              Joined:

              @Jordonf9:

              Any thoughts about sleeveless shirts?

              Effective but severe way of fixing the UHF sleeve length dilemma!

              last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • GilesG
                Giles
                IHUK Crew
                Joined:

                @rocket:

                light weight white summer / under t-shirts (fitted cut), could be sold in a double pack for both customer and retailer satisfaction

                Here's (what I think is) the problem.  Loopwheel costs a load.  The 6.5oz actually costs us more than the 7.5oz to make.  Are you prepared to pay those sort of prices for an undershirt? And popping 2 of them in a packet does not make them any cheaper to make…..

                "OK face up to it - you're useless but generally pretty honest and straightforward . . . it's a rare combination of qualities that I have come to admire in you" - Geo 2011

                last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • DrBabyhorseD
                  DrBabyhorse
                  Joined:

                  @Giles:

                  @rocket:

                  light weight white summer / under t-shirts (fitted cut), could be sold in a double pack for both customer and retailer satisfaction

                  Here's (what I think is) the problem.  Loopwheel costs a load.  The 6.5oz actually costs us more than the 7.5oz to make.  Are you prepared to pay those sort of prices for an undershirt? And popping 2 of them in a packet does not make them any cheaper to make…..

                  Do they have to be loopwheel? The wider (and same width) body is less desirable, in my opinion, for an undershirt.

                  Enviado desde mi iPhone utilizando Tapatalk

                  last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • rocketR
                    rocket
                    Joined:

                    @Giles:

                    @rocket:

                    light weight white summer / under t-shirts (fitted cut), could be sold in a double pack for both customer and retailer satisfaction

                    Here's (what I think is) the problem.  Loopwheel costs a load.  The 6.5oz actually costs us more than the 7.5oz to make.  Are you prepared to pay those sort of prices for an undershirt? And popping 2 of them in a packet does not make them any cheaper to make…..

                    PM'ed

                    rocketrocksrox 🤙🏼🤙🏾

                    It's all humbug, like everywhere
                    R.I.P. Geo

                    last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • rocketR
                      rocket
                      Joined:

                      @DrBabyhorse:

                      @Giles:

                      @rocket:

                      light weight white summer / under t-shirts (fitted cut), could be sold in a double pack for both customer and retailer satisfaction

                      Here's (what I think is) the problem.  Loopwheel costs a load.  The 6.5oz actually costs us more than the 7.5oz to make.  Are you prepared to pay those sort of prices for an undershirt? And popping 2 of them in a packet does not make them any cheaper to make…..

                      Do they have to be loopwheel? The wider (and same width) body is less desirable, in my opinion, for an undershirt.

                      Enviado desde mi iPhone utilizando Tapatalk

                      not from my point and actual was thinking more about to get a ultimate (you gonna have to have goals, like the Lions tonight).. tee that you can wear alone and still have the option to wear to work under a business shirt…

                      rocketrocksrox 🤙🏼🤙🏾

                      It's all humbug, like everywhere
                      R.I.P. Geo

                      last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • xtcclassicX
                        xtcclassic
                        啓蒙家
                        Joined:

                        I certainly wouldn't need it to be loopwheel, just good quality cotton with the right (fitted) fit and built with the typical IH quality.

                        last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • ?
                          A Former User
                          Joined:

                          There is just no satisfying you lot  :D.  We now, finally, have an IHT with the sturdier collar AND a perfect "summer-weight" (for you delicate folk), and somehow that is still not good enough?!

                          I am of the mind that the 7.5oz IHT's already are undershirts!  And with the IHT-1610, these are the best undershirts IH has ever made!  What else do you want?  An Iron Heart sweat-wicking fabric??

                          I have been wearing 7.5oz IHT's as undershirts everyday (including the ihpt'z), in 100+' weather in the desert, for five years.  It is as easy as breathing.  In my opinion, if you feel too hot in 6.5oz loopwheeled fabric, then you should buy a different brand.  There are lots of companies making thin, breathable fabric.  There are, however, not a lot of companies making luscious loopwheeled, top-quality-cotton shirts on specialized machines. I felt that the 5.5oz fabric on the TWT-1301 was too light by Iron Heart standards. The collar had very little structure and would not hold its shape when worn. The fabric was surprisingly thin and stretchy and felt flimsy to the touch. Any lighter than 5.5oz and you might as well be wearing a Nike Dri-fit tee or something like it. Iron Heart should stick to their guns. Let people buy their delicates somewhere else!

                          But if you do make flimsy shirts for people that overheat easily, please use the same collar as the iht-1610!!

                          last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • rocketR
                            rocket
                            Joined:

                            It's not about this or that, it's about a and. There is a reason for diff oz denim and there is a reason for diff oz tees. Call it personal preferences…. and I have btw stacks of IH tees and this for a reason... quality

                            rocketrocksrox 🤙🏼🤙🏾

                            It's all humbug, like everywhere
                            R.I.P. Geo

                            last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • ?
                              A Former User
                              Joined:

                              Personal preferences, no doubt.  I would prefer to see Giles sell the tees he has already made, which are perfectly suitable as "undershirts", rather than hear people say, "what about this idea?" or "how about this instead…" or "if they were only lighter", and then not buy tees  😞

                              last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • xtcclassicX
                                xtcclassic
                                啓蒙家
                                Joined:

                                My only concern with the IH t's I've tried is they are much too bulky and not really a "fitted" fit, especially in the sleeves. I'm fine with the 6.5oz part, although I'd be fine with lighter weight as well (I never thought I'd be all that interested in a 14oz denim from Iron Heart but I'm LOVING my new 14oz 666's). But to function as an undershirt, it should be more of a slim, fitted cut, especially in the sleeves.

                                last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • ?
                                  A Former User
                                  Joined:

                                  I'm definitely in the heavy-weight minority, but I would love to see more people in Iron Heart Tees on a daily basis.  I'd love to see what lightweight magic the crew can come up with to satisfy the need for lighter, stretchier, more fitted IHT's.  I'm all in, regardless… 😘

                                  last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • DrBabyhorseD
                                    DrBabyhorse
                                    Joined:

                                    @xtcclassic:

                                    My only concern with the IH t's I've tried is they are much too bulky and not really a "fitted" fit, especially in the sleeves. I'm fine with the 6.5oz part, although I'd be fine with lighter weight as well (I never thought I'd be all that interested in a 14oz denim from Iron Heart but I'm LOVING my new 14oz 666's). But to function as an undershirt, it should be more of a slim, fitted cut, especially in the sleeves.

                                    This.

                                    I don't care about the weight. It just seems like loopwheeled shirts are made for people with bellies.

                                    Enviado desde mi iPhone utilizando Tapatalk

                                    last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • Max PowerM
                                      Max Power
                                      Raw and Unwashed
                                      Joined:

                                      I love the 7,5 oz Shirts and wear a lot of them, but for a undershirt I'd prefer a slimmer cut and lighter fabric as well. I wouldn't want to wear those heavy current ones under a business Shirt (but then I don't want to anyway). So, I don't ask for new Tees, but can understand the request.

                                      @elclintor:

                                      > I don't care what people say.. The Max Power way is the right way…

                                      last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • tmgT
                                        tmg
                                        Joined:

                                        I wasn't going to chime in on this T shirt debate, but a couple of comments echo my own experience. I've bought various iterations of printed IH T's for the last 5 years, and love the heavyweight fabric, but have noticed that the changes in fit have made them less suitable for me, and it's principally the tight neck and lack of taper that makes them wear a bit oddly on me. I've bought 6 RMC T's, (the basic 2 pack undershirts), and love the fit, but would love it more if IH could do something in a similar vein.

                                        last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • DionD
                                          Dion
                                          Joined:

                                          A heavy IHSH-76/99 successor in 18 oz (old or new).

                                          last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • FurattoHeddoF
                                            FurattoHeddo
                                            Joined:

                                            I remember the first ever sample of the IHD-01 was made with the old 18oz, but the factory couldn't make a production run. Maybe they can now?

                                            http://www.ironheart.co.uk/forum/index.php?topic=282.msg55078#msg55078

                                            "Don't ever be sorry"

                                            last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Copyright Iron Heart 2025.