Watches - another OCD problem
-
Thanks, Davito. Not worn it for years, had to dig out the photo. I did enjoy it though, in its day. Relatively flat and if I leave mine out in the sun all day, or on the windowsill, I can still get maybe 30 seconds of glow from it. A bit of the 60s in that glow. They also made the same model with a date like nizzel55's….I think I have another one somewhere, much later gold quartz w/italicized face. Don't know what I was thinking of. Must have been a trade.
Here's another, with old radium, all gone though, from perhaps a bit later, the early 70s?, by Titoni.
-
Love the Tissot. Reminds me very much of the Omega Rail watch. Funny how Omega and Tissot share so much history and are now owned by the same group.
-
Or do you mean this Tudor Sub :p
-
That really does look great @Anesthetist I think I prefer it on the NATO too.
-
^ Funny, coz I can't get a Tudor Sub off my wrist. @Anesthetist:
Or do you mean this Tudor Sub :p
HAHAHAHA. DAMN.
-
Some pics of the 7169/0 Monte Carlo I recently picked up:
-
So gorgeous! At a loss for words man!
-
Thank you @davito and @Anesthetist !
-
bravo @babyknight
-
Gorgeous @babyknight Could I bother you for a side on picture while on the wrist so I could get a feel for the thickness of the case? Only if you have the chance, of course.
-
Thank you @madmonday
Sure @Qinhan, here's quick photo with my cellphone - not the best quality but hopefully you get the idea. As with I think most vintage Rolex/Tudor from this era, it's really not that thick especially compared to the modern pieces. It has enough presence to be a sports watch without being overbearing.
