Watches - another OCD problem
-
@Chiba:
What do you guys think of the limited edition version of Seiko's MM300, the SBDX012. I've got one on reserve at Yodobashi that should arrive on the 23rd. These are the best pics I've seen to date.
Looks good. Simple and clean.
-
I prefer the standard edition without the gold, simply because I don't like gold on watches.
-
@Maynard:
I prefer the standard edition without the gold, simply because I don't like gold on watches.
Same.
Great watch, nonetheless.
-
my explorer II (1972)…
-
@babyknight
what a great watch, great wristshot -
damn @babyknight lovely watch mate!
-
-
That is a fine, fine watch Babyknight. I'm a big fan of the standard Explorer II as well, both in black dial and even more so in white. Sometimes I consider getting that one over a Submariner…
-
Thank you for your kind words, @Sugar Mountain . Are you interested in the modern Explorer IIs? Cool watches. In comparison to the Subs, I think the main issue is case size. The modern Explorer II would be too big for my wrist at least, whereas I think the Sub is in such a sweet spot. Once you have them both on your wrist I am sure one will speak to you more!
-
@babyknight No, I'm not a fan of the modern Explorer II. The increased size, the shape of the hands and the big lugs just don't appeal to me. I'm lusting after the Ref.16570. I'd love a Sub too but they are a bit common around town in HK!
-
@Sugar Mountain but isn't HK one of the easier places in the world to find a vintage sub?
-
Since the forum is in a Rolex frame of mind, here is an uninspired pic of mine:
-
very nice @Anesthetist
-
very nice @Anesthetist , very similar in style to my railmaster
found this a few weeks back , it belonged to my wifes father
ive never really been into watches but after looking through this thread and a few others im slowly getting sucked in , two on my wish list are a Omega speedmaster and a vintage sub