ULTRA HEAVY RAW - IH-1955-UHR, IH-666-UHR and IH-634-UHR

[Islander]

@Max:

Around 2"

Thanks

[Giles]

IH-1955-UHR are complete and will be shipping from Japan tomorrow….

[seanocono]

Stoked!

[Fergz]

Looking forward to seeing them with an eye firmly fixed on mid June and some 666 UHRness!

[babyknight]

bring. it. on.

[Giles]

@Fergz:

How do you reckon ye will go with the arcuates on the UHRs at this stage Giles?

Like this:

[davidl890]

Look at that denim!

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[JCar2666]

I'm gonna assume the above patch will be the same on the other two models?

[Giles]

^ Well, the lot number may be correct on the others…...

[Giles]

@davidl890:

Look at that denim!

Here you go….

[JCMx800]

Nice!!!

[superfuzz]

When should the 666 drop, G?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Giles]

A month or so….

[superfuzz]

Sweet, thanks!

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Friday]

^^ a very good news for me ^^

[theding]

Looking at the pics this denim seems a lot brighter and 'bluer' than the normal 21oz. Is that the case? I'm either getting
Some 1955 or 634 UHR or the standard 1955 or 634XHS and colour will probably be the decider.

[Giles]

UHR quite bright….S dark....XHS very dark

[theding]

Thanks G. Now it's down to the 634XHS and 1955.

[theding]

Another question if I may. Not sure what thread is best so keeping it here.

UHR is out due to brightness. I now really want some jeans in the XHS. Unfortunately the tighter leg on the 634XHS (versus the 634S) makes them a no no.

My 634S-GR are pretty much the perfect fit for me and the 634S are good but a little tighter than I would like in the thigh. Based on the measurement guides on the website I reckon sizing down one to a 33 tag pair of 1955s would be good but then I lose out on the XHS.

So, my question, will you be making the 1955 with the XHS material?

[seanocono]

You could size up to the 35 to get the 13.5" thigh that you need in the XHS. If you wear a belt, you won't even notice the difference in the waist.