Your browser does not seem to support JavaScript. As a result, your viewing experience will be diminished, and you have been placed in read-only mode.
Please download a browser that supports JavaScript, or enable it if it's disabled (i.e. NoScript).
@xtcclassic:
Uzbekistani Horse Rapist.
derserves a quote. ahhahahaha
If you don't like leg twist, move on to another thread…...
Can I stay..?
Yup.
Shrink test results….There is some tweaking to do to the rise of both styles, but apart from that they're good.....
the 1955 in a w33 or even a w32 would be a nice thing to have from what i can tell! hmmmmm… :-\
Liking the look of that 13.5 thigh on the 1955's.
Hoping one of the tweaks involves a higher rise for the 666'es…
G, both are tagged 34?
@hajduk:
yessir!…
It does…..
I'm just gonna assume that was in response to my question
@Seul:
same here
Yes it was. Rise on both cuts has come out too small, we will be correcting that….
Huzzah
good!
I don't have a slightest idea on how a UHR denim behaves. So will another hot soak on the 55 brings another variance on the post soak measurement G-San, or no more?
It should not. I washed the living shit out of these…..
Good!!!
Maybe sending a pair of unwashed lvc 55's back might be a good idea for a once-over before final product is issued.
The 1955S is our interpretation of the 55 it is not a direct copy…..If getting an exact copy is your goal, we are not the place to buy from....
