• Home
    • Recent
    • Calendar
    • Register
    • Login
    Iron Heart Forum
    Iron Heart Forum

    Iron Heart Fall/Winter 2025 Collection Preview - Now Live

    IH-555S-21 - 21oz Selvedge Denim Slim Jeans - Indigo

    Bottoms
    271
    1.6k
    639.8k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • BluegrassB
      Bluegrass
      Joined:

      I love this cut - roomy/comfortable at top, and fitted but not too tight through the legs.  they look equally great stacked or cuffed - and not that this means crap, but it's my wife's favorite of all my jeans. I wont declare a favorite cut, but it's a 3-way tie betw. Beatles, 634 and 555.

      last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • JamesMargJ
        JamesMarg
        Joined:

        @vokineberg:

        Thanks for reply.
        Actually i am not worry about waist, even 34 inches is OK for me.
        But my thigh and knee is little bit bigger than normal.
        It is OK for slim straight fit, but I'am worry about skinny fit.
        But I think I'll try it in 36.

        Why not go for a 666 cut then VB?
        You still get slim, but with a bigger thigh and knee.

        last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • vokinebergV
          vokineberg
          Joined:

          @JamesMarg:

          Why not go for a 666 cut then VB?
          You still get slim, but with a bigger thigh and knee.

          Yes, it seems a good idea.

          last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • BluegrassB
            Bluegrass
            Joined:

            The big difference between 555 and 666 is, 555 has higher rise, roomier top block - and trimmer from the knee down - looking at the measurements it seems like the thigh measurement is similar?

            last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • derivative666D
              derivative666
              Joined:

              You can't go wrong with either both my favorite cuts

              "honorable mention to the bearded giant aka derivative666 for being a stand up dude & not changing with the seasons since i've been around these parts" Monday

              last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • JamesMargJ
                JamesMarg
                Joined:

                @Bluegrass:

                The big difference between 555 and 666 is, 555 has higher rise, roomier top block - and trimmer from the knee down - looking at the measurements it seems like the thigh measurement is similar?

                True that Bluegrass.
                But my 555's feel way slimmer in the thigh than my 666XHS's, both size 33, and the thighs are the same measurement!
                It must have something to do with the knee being bigger

                last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • BluegrassB
                  Bluegrass
                  Joined:

                  yeah, that makes sense… i have the 666S and the thigh measures are virtually the same - but the taper is far less extreme than the 555.  I still find it remarkable that at 6'7" 225 lbs I can wear the 555 and not look like I'm trying to be 20 yrs old again.

                  last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • JamesMargJ
                    JamesMarg
                    Joined:

                    I think IH cuts are extremely versatile like that…
                    Very forgiving with the bigger sizes!
                    Not that i know from experience, but just looking at the measurements.
                    I think some brands go to far with 36-38 inch waists, which taper down super intense like a smaller size.
                    In other words, IH has just got their cuts right for alot of people to enjoy!

                    last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • SeruRitchiS
                      SeruRitchi
                      Haraki san Prodigy
                      Joined:

                      @Bluegrass:

                      I still find it remarkable that at 6'7" 225 lbs I can wear the 555 and not look like I'm trying to be 20 yrs old again.

                      Bluegrass, you give me hope. I had a conversation with my (younger) girlfriend a couple of days ago that went something like this:

                      Me: What style of jeans do you like best on guys? Baggy, straight, slim-cut, skinny?
                      Her: Whatever you're comfortable wearing.
                      Me: But ideally, if it was up to you, what's your preference compared to the style I'm wearing now? [slim-fit, 7.8" hem]
                      Her: Well…[diplomatic pause]…a lot of guys are wearing jeans much tighter than those these days.

                      She seems to like Russell Brand, and I like his recent public opinions about politicians, so perhaps I should wriggle my 43 year old self into a "Super-Duper Slim" cut.

                      last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • BluegrassB
                        Bluegrass
                        Joined:

                        hhaha, fortunately this aint no russell brand cut!!

                        last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • J
                          JerUrsidae
                          Joined:

                          Some nice evo coming through on the 555-01's:

                          last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • SeulS
                            Seul
                            Joined:

                            Oh yeah: those are coming along nicely!..

                            last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • SeruRitchiS
                              SeruRitchi
                              Haraki san Prodigy
                              Joined:

                              @Bluegrass:

                              hhaha, fortunately this aint no russell brand cut!!

                              Thanks for the pics Bluegrass :), and JerUrsidae.

                              last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • GilesG
                                Giles
                                IHUK Crew
                                Joined:

                                Restocked….

                                "OK face up to it - you're useless but generally pretty honest and straightforward . . . it's a rare combination of qualities that I have come to admire in you" - Geo 2011

                                last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • derivative666D
                                  derivative666
                                  Joined:

                                  Love that patch

                                  "honorable mention to the bearded giant aka derivative666 for being a stand up dude & not changing with the seasons since i've been around these parts" Monday

                                  last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • Max PowerM
                                    Max Power
                                    Raw and Unwashed
                                    Joined:

                                    Yes, indeed. But the old one was already nice. I love the 555 cut lately. Dunno what took me so long. Probably because I lost a lot of weight.

                                    @elclintor:

                                    > I don't care what people say.. The Max Power way is the right way…

                                    last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • B
                                      bertoni
                                      Joined:

                                      Can anyone help me here? I'm searching for a slimmer cut and am looking at the 555 (01 and 02), the 666S and the Raw Busters. But I don't seem to be able to find anything that will fit me properly. I have a pair of 634S W34 that fit fine. The waist has stretched out to 35 inches but I'd like more taper/slimmer fit from the knee down. The Buster Raws will shrink down to a 12 inch thigh, like the 555-02 and I feel that'll probably be a bit tighter than i'd like. Will either of them offer much stretch in the thigh area? My ACTUAL thigh measures 25 inches (measurement taken from crotch and around). I like the thought of some 18oz really for a change but I don't see how anything will fit me right. The 555-01 will offer me 12.3 which MIGHT be ok. Any thoughts/experiences from other 34/35 inch waisters?

                                      last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • derivative666D
                                        derivative666
                                        Joined:

                                        I have 34w 666 & 36w 555
                                        Both are my favorite cuts

                                        666 is a tighter top block and thigh, less tapered from knee down than 555.

                                        555 is roomy in thigh and top block almost like 634 but very tapered from knee down.

                                        "honorable mention to the bearded giant aka derivative666 for being a stand up dude & not changing with the seasons since i've been around these parts" Monday

                                        last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • B
                                          bertoni
                                          Joined:

                                          Hey
                                          Thanks for the reply. Looking at the sizing charts for the 555-02 w34, the waist would shrink to a 34.5…perfect. But the thigh starts at 12.5 so will shrink to what? 12.2? 12? That would be more than an inch difference on the thigh between my 634S. There is certainly room for some thigh reduction but i'm not sure I could pull off an inch! This is my first foray into slimmer denim territory and i'm not sure IH has anything for me seeing as I fall into the dreaded 35 inch waist "no fly zone"!!
                                          The 555-01 looks like my only hope with a 12.3 inch thigh.

                                          last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • derivative666D
                                            derivative666
                                            Joined:

                                            My 555 is 01 not 02 21 stretches like crazy and is not stubborn like the 18oz

                                            "honorable mention to the bearded giant aka derivative666 for being a stand up dude & not changing with the seasons since i've been around these parts" Monday

                                            last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Copyright Iron Heart 2025.