• Home
    • Recent
    • Calendar
    • Register
    • Login
    Iron Heart Forum
    Iron Heart Forum

    Iron Heart Fall/Winter 2025 Collection Preview - Now Live

    ULTRA HEAVY RAW - IH-1955-UHR, IH-666-UHR and IH-634-UHR

    Bottoms
    97
    669
    151.4k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • TinManT
      TinMan
      啓蒙家
      Joined:

      @Max:

      Seconding Urb and adam (and many others). The 634 cut is fantastic on guys with small waist, but 33 and above looks strange, as the leg is getting so wide. A little more taper would fix this. around 8,25" leg opening with 33/34 waist would be a great tube cut, but not a skinny one.

      That said, I think the 666 and 634 would sell great. The 555 cut in 23 oz - well, I don't even want to speak about comfort then. But it would sell, I'm sure.

      I concur!!  I love the 634 cut and I am size 34 with long legs.  a little taper to the ankle hem would be nice.  I prefer a leg opening no bigger the 9 inches, but really like an 8.5 inch opening.

      Tinman on the go…

      Now, I have an IRONHEART!!

      last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • S
        Snowy
        Joined:

        I'm down for a 55 cut. This cyclist's thighs don't work in many cuts :/. 55 looks pretty perfect.

        last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • FurattoHeddoF
          FurattoHeddo
          Joined:

          ^A modified 55 cut with a lower rise, especially the front rise would definitely grab my attention … An authentic 55 FR and having a bit of a gut/belly don't mix is my experience 😉

          "Don't ever be sorry"

          last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • ChrisC
            Chris
            Raw and Unwashed
            Joined:

            I think the rise would have to be lowered for the 55 cut to sell well.  Most people don't want jeans that come up to their belly button.  From about the hips down, the 55 does look good, and works especially well for the strong thighs guys.

            EDIT: Damn, FurattoHeddo beat me to it. 😉

            last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • llvlaglneL
              llvlaglne
              Joined:

              Furatto and snowy - agreed 55 cut with the rise like a 634 would be good universal cut

              "…think of a world tour as similar as to the sisterhood of the traveling pants." -LandoCal126

              last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • TinManT
                TinMan
                啓蒙家
                Joined:

                My dream cut

                Now, I have an IRONHEART!!

                last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • 5
                  50shadesoffade
                  Joined:

                  I already own a 1955, and I would buy another pair in this denim. I don't have any strong opinions about the rise, but I agree with those who say that a lower rise would sell better and make for a good, universal cut. Personally, I'd also prefer even more taper from the knee and down.

                  Giles, in the 1955S thread you said that you had to make and sell at least 100 pairs of a particular jean in order to profit. Does the same math apply for this denim? For instance, does it cost you more to make 700 634S and 40 1955S, than just 740 634S? Just curious  🙂

                  last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • Adman103A
                    Adman103
                    Joined:

                    Whew- all this talk of new cuts…  the 634S is perfect for me.  I'm glad it's the signature cut!

                    Guitars, denim, and astronomy

                    666PD, Vulcans, 666SII, 666D, and 666XHS

                    last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • fanyaF
                      fanya
                      Joined:

                      @Giles:

                      @fanya:

                      If it was made once why can't it be made again?

                      If what was made once?  If you are talking the SE collab jacket, that is a completely different denim.

                      @Giles:

                      If H can make the material, we will def do 634 and 666

                      My question is, why wouldn't he be able to make the 21/23 oz denim again?  It's been made before so what's stopping him from making it again if you order it?

                      last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • GingerMagicianG
                        GingerMagician
                        Joined:

                        @Giles:

                        If H can make the material, we will def do 634 and 666

                        This is music to my ears - well, it'll certainly give me a tricky decision anyway…

                        Simon

                        @Megatron1505:

                        > You're not even bloody ginger  >:(

                        last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • GilesG
                          Giles
                          IHUK Crew
                          Joined:

                          @fanya:

                          My question is, why wouldn't he be able to make the 21/23 oz denim again?  It's been made before so what's stopping him from making it again if you order it?

                          Fuck knows, but if H says no, I don't push back.  That's just the way H and I work….If he say no, I accept it and move on

                          "OK face up to it - you're useless but generally pretty honest and straightforward . . . it's a rare combination of qualities that I have come to admire in you" - Geo 2011

                          last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • GilesG
                            Giles
                            IHUK Crew
                            Joined:

                            @50shadesoffade:

                            Giles, in the 1955S thread you said that you had to make and sell at least 100 pairs of a particular jean in order to profit. Does the same math apply for this denim? For instance, does it cost you more to make 700 634S and 40 1955S, than just 740 634S? Just curious  🙂

                            I'm not sure I ever said "to profit", but the basic rule is, I can't make less than 100 jeans of a material/cut without pissing off the factory.  I'm ugly enough to not care about pissing them off occasionally, but each time I do that, my ability to ask for favours diminishes, so I try not to…...

                            "OK face up to it - you're useless but generally pretty honest and straightforward . . . it's a rare combination of qualities that I have come to admire in you" - Geo 2011

                            last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • summ3rhaysS
                              summ3rhays
                              Joined:

                              666 will likely be my next pair. If that pair is 21/23 denom that would be a win/win.

                              IG: summ3rhays & Indigobleed

                              last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • BlackheartB
                                Blackheart
                                Joined:

                                What ever gets made from this denim, I want it. Period.

                                last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • 5
                                  50shadesoffade
                                  Joined:

                                  @Giles:

                                  @50shadesoffade:

                                  Giles, in the 1955S thread you said that you had to make and sell at least 100 pairs of a particular jean in order to profit. Does the same math apply for this denim? For instance, does it cost you more to make 700 634S and 40 1955S, than just 740 634S? Just curious  🙂

                                  I'm not sure I ever said "to profit", but the basic rule is, I can't make less than 100 jeans of a material/cut without pissing off the factory.  I'm ugly enough to not care about pissing them off occasionally, but each time I do that, my ability to ask for favours diminishes, so I try not to…...

                                  No, you never said profit. I just assumed that's what you meant. Gotcha 🙂

                                  Oh, by the way, you could make a hell of a lot of coasters  😉

                                  last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • fanyaF
                                    fanya
                                    Joined:

                                    @Giles:

                                    @fanya:

                                    My question is, why wouldn't he be able to make the 21/23 oz denim again?  It's been made before so what's stopping him from making it again if you order it?

                                    Fuck knows, but if H says no, I don't push back.  That's just the way H and I work….If he say no, I accept it and move on

                                    That's cool, I was just curious.

                                    I'll take a 634 if it happens 🙂

                                    last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • Josh JamesJ
                                      Josh James
                                      Joined:

                                      @grandmasterben:

                                      I hate sounding like one of those dudes that's obsessed with leg warmer denim, but for me the 634s cut with about a half inch smaller hem would be perfection.

                                      WURD  they're perfect for my red wings. But a 1/2" tighter for my vans would be sweet.

                                      Joshjames

                                      last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • N
                                        Nerkg
                                        Banned
                                        Joined:

                                        Was the last batch treated with fade retard chemical? I assume no but just wondering

                                        last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • ?
                                          Guest
                                          Joined:

                                          loomstate dude

                                          last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • N
                                            Nerkg
                                            Banned
                                            Joined:

                                            Oh yea i read that , duh. The marbling is insane on this denim

                                            last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Copyright Iron Heart 2025.