IH-666D - 17oz Duck Slim Straight Cut Jeans - Brown
-
Just got mine
W: 34.9in
FR: 11in
RR:15.75in
TH: 13.25in
KN: 9.25in
Hem: 8.8in
IN: 36.5inIf I get these hemmed to a 32, the hem will measure 9.1in
I'll definitely have to stretch these.
Color is better than I thought it would be, not orangey at all.
Definitely not as slim, thigh down, as I thought they would be, especially paired with the actual sized down top block.
0.6in larger than my 666S thigh down.
Softer than I thought they'd be.Shane thanx for your follow-up. Please show us some of your beautiful pix.
-
-
Already stretched half an inch in the last few hours just while sitting at my desk working on the computer…
-
Finn mate I believe Shane's are the tagged 36 with a measured 35 waist. Uuups answered by the master himself
how is your feeling in them Shane? I am sure they look good on you.They look alright I guess. Might have to get them tapered since there really isn't any tapering from the knee down.
-
They look alright I guess. Might have to get them tapered since there really isn't any tapering from the knee down.
thanks for the reply mate - just realized that there even isn't a tagged 35 in these - so totally christal clear…
the above isn't what I wanted to hear actually...thought they had atleast a little bit of taper, so I guess tapering is the only way (for these that are on the look-out for it!)... -
They look alright I guess. Might have to get them tapered since there really isn't any tapering from the knee down.
thanks for the reply mate - just realized that there even isn't a tagged 35 in these - so totally christal clear…
the above isn't what I wanted to hear actually...thought they had atleast a little bit of taper, so I guess tapering is the only way (for these that are on the look-out for it!)...I mean if I had an inseam of 36.5in then they would taper 0.4in I guess. But is that a lot?
If i get them hemmed to 32-33in(possibly stack), then there will be about 0.15in taper.
This is just my pair of 36's though.
-
I knew the Ducks would be here today, so I borrowed a co-worker's camera for my first ever fit pics. (Giles, you and Paula should run for office.. you run the tightest ship ever. It is like clockwork. And an absolute pleasure to do 'business' with. Thank you.)
More of what's already been said above… These ducks are a perfect product. Amazing. Perfect. Not too slim, not too loose. Firm, but comfortable. I'm not sure I'm ever going to them 'em off!
Sorry for the shite photos, but it's half a look anyway. For those who are still on the fence, and can pull the trigger.. you will have zero regrets!
I'm 6'2" / 175lbs. Tagged 34. Cuffed twice. We'll see about a hem.. they cuff really nicely.. may just let 'em live..
CB
-
Looks good Bain.
-
They will Alex man you will see
as they are less tapered than the 634s and top block is really nice cutted it will give you a nice slim straight look (not superslim) when sized tts and thighs are alright.
You handle the dc4001 very nice, so you can handle the ducksuckers too
quack quackLooking forward to your fit mate
-
Buddy Finn, 666s is superslim while 666d is "only" slim cut imho. Dont forget 666s is unsanforised and gets much tighter imho. So therefore yes less than 666s….aaah my english...
And Sorry mate direct comparison with 634 only works for lower sizes..still I think compared to the 634 cut and in its relation to a slim cut 666d are less tapered. But I am not the mathematical expert in this area
i also compared with the Top Block area between 634 (roomier) and 666d (skinnier), this is why i think 666d gives a better straight cut from top to bottom. But hei still loving all my 634 variations, got 6 of em Dont want to confuse
get the ducks now hehe
