London Olympics
-
Yeah, but even though Sychronised Swimming isn’t Faster, Higher, Stronger it’s incredibly technical, physically demanding and requires amazing co-ordination and precision. Doesn’t really float my boat, although I find it quite entertaining! Quite a few of the “sports” in the olympics (archery, some of the shooting events, some of the equestrian events for example) don’t fall into the F, H, S category in simple terms. I guess I like that the Olympics is so diverse, and showcases so many different “sports” that we wouldn’t normally consider watching (and also opens up the games to some countries which only have competitors in few disciplines). If you take out “subjectivity” then a lot of the gymnastics events wouldn’t qualify. No idea where I was going with this (apart from my need to disagree with G)… anyway, I’m enjoying it much more than I expected!
-
I thought you were watching beach volleyball, Seul. A sport which actually does have cheerleaders at the matches, by the way.;)
-
I agree completely with you, Madame B, about the technical and physical demands of Synchronized Swimming, but the whole thing is based on "pretty". They have to wear makeup and smile like coked up cruise directors. Same thing for gymnasts. I just don't like it. And whenever there's some sort of scoring drama/controversy, all I can think is that it wouldn't happen in an event like rowing. Did you cross the finish line first? Well, then you won. Congratulations.
I, like you, love getting to see less mainstream stuff (in the Winter Olympics I got seriously obsessed on curling). And the Olympics straddle the nexus of sports, entertainment, spectacle and pageantry, in my opinion. They're kind of the exception to all the rules.:)
-
Oh, and while I’m on my soapbox: am truly delighted with Team GB’s success, but we (and I think many other countries) rely very heavily on overseas training facilities and coaching - in particular in the USA - so whilst we’re patting ourselves on the back we should remember that (and say a huge thank you)
p.s. Totally agree with Chris about the forced presentation of many of these “sports”, the sparkly outfits and heavy make-up are gag-making
(oh, and we too got obsessed with the curling!) -
I think that was one of our rules- if you have to wear makeup or sequins, it's not a sport. Fun to watch, sure. Sport, no.
On a slightly different note, indoor volleyball has a totally different vibe than beach volleyball. I think I like it better.
-
Curling in beach volleyball outfits is where it's at.
With a few added sequins on the womens’ bums!
*Mme B remembers back to some of those women and winces…
-
-
-
-
I saw that Lando. I'm surprised he didn't break his neck. They showed it in slo-mo on tv and the bar actually bent across his neck
-
That part is most certainly tabloid journalism
agree…
the weightlifter seems to be fine, we had some interview stuff in the German TV...
-
Good to hear. I saw that too, and it looked painful. That had the potential to go really badly.
-
That had the potential to go really badly.
True, he could have wet himself at the same time!
Well the Aussies have won a couple of golds in the past day or two, so the media here is going nuts. I get pissed off with the hypocricy of the media. One moment they're watching someone lose a race and patronising them with "oh, isn't it great that Joe Bloggs has given it everything…the Olympics is not about winning, it's about giving it your best", and 2 seconds later they show the medal tally and say "Australia has two more golds, which means we are better than Uruguay and Tajikistan, and now move into 17th place on the table just behind Moldova...".
I reckon the winners deserve a medal, but the Medal Tally thing is a pile of shit which goes against the spirit. Who cares what country won most or least?
I feel better now, thanks.
