• Home
    • Recent
    • Calendar
    • Register
    • Login
    Iron Heart Forum
    Iron Heart Forum

    Iron Heart Fall/Winter 2025 Collection Preview - Now Live

    Photograph and Camera talk

    General Chat
    213
    3.0k
    916.6k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • derivative666D
      derivative666
      Joined:

      S90 & S95 love that it us full manual

      "honorable mention to the bearded giant aka derivative666 for being a stand up dude & not changing with the seasons since i've been around these parts" Monday

      last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • ?
        Guest
        Joined:

        I had the Canon S90, and now have the S95. Another camera to consider is the Panasonic LX5. I chose the Canon over the Panasonic primarily because it is even more compact. Canon also has an underwater housing available. Regardless, both are terrific cameras. A camera forum I would recommend is:

        http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/

        last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • L
          laxlife1234
          Joined:

          @Finn666:

          great…can`t wait for it mate 🙂 enjoy your first shooting lad...

          what i think ill feel kinda uncomfortable about on my first session is that i dont like to stand under pressure. since i see myself as a kinda free artist and all that...should be a new experience pour moi 🙂

          well, since it was one of my friends I shot it wasn't as nerving.. Here are 2 shots I took (out of a hundred or so).

          I am thinking the second one needs to be re-edited (ie. look at the records).

          Here are the originals to give an idea of how much work I did to get them to look like that (his wish is my command!). I do however want to note these aren't going to be photos that are going to be blown up. He is using them for posters and business cards and such.

          last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • L
            laxlife1234
            Joined:

            2 more..

            Love the way this first one came out!

            last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • jbphoto23J
              jbphoto23
              Joined:

              Lax, those look much much better. Maybe get a curves layer going on those first ones you posted and bring the mid up and get some contrast going. They're a bit underexposed and flat. (Just my opinion, only love man).

              www.JoshBustosPhoto.com

              last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • L
                laxlife1234
                Joined:

                Thanks man! Yeah, a few of the pictures can be a little brighter. I will be going back into CS5 and editing a few I have already edited and the ton of them I didn't get to editing yet. But I know what you mean and in all honesty I would rather have someone say they look like shit for whatever reason than saying they love them because when they say why they look like shit I have next time to try and improve!

                last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • jbphoto23J
                  jbphoto23
                  Joined:

                  Exactly man. Constructive criticism and practiceI practice practice will only make you better. Just keep photographing and don't sweat the mistakes because you learn that way, and sometimes the mistakes end up being better than what you originally had in mind. Keep up the good work my dude!

                  www.JoshBustosPhoto.com

                  last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • urbanwoodsmanU
                    urbanwoodsman
                    Banned
                    Joined:

                    Lax, if you're gonna desaturate the first image so much you might as well just make it BW. When you bring it down that much it just ends up looking muddy and too brown.

                    Bring up the blacks in the second image because they're def under exposed. Don't know if you're shooting to RAW but I do most of my color tweaking in RAW.

                    last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • L
                      laxlife1234
                      Joined:

                      Yeah, I hear ya both! The first image I really like though, I am a fan of desaturated photos almost black and white but enough to tell they aren't. I shot all of the photoshoot in raw so I could easily adjust the light. But some of the images I have to go back and re-edit when I am able to get back on a mac because they are underexposed.

                      I am starting to think I might want to get a wider angle lens though. I know I am using a crop and what not but I might as well just get the 50 1.4 and get the 24 1.4. I find myself never really going to 1.2 because it is honestly too soft. Plus I was fine with the 50mm for a while but it is too hard to get wide shots. The lens isn't also as sharp as I would like it to be. But then again I just had an idea tonight, going to think it over though if I really want to go through that whole entire process.

                      last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • Finn666F
                        Finn666
                        Joined:

                        now that pic is dope…any more infos?

                        and i don`t even dare to write my opinion on that lens switch again... 😠

                        last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • L
                          laxlife1234
                          Joined:

                          Hahaha, I think I will just stick to the 50, but start saving up for a 24 1.4. I will just deal with the body I have now, even though I was going to upgrade that first but whatever. You can say told ya so though 😛

                          Thanks though! Info… it was shot @ 1.2 ISO 100, 0.8 sec. It was being lit by a car and I got the background to look like that since the relatively long exposure and there was a sprinkler going off that made that misty looking effect. I shot it in RAW, tonemapped it in photomatix, then edited in CS5 and made those artificial rays (I'm a cheater).

                          last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • GeoG
                            Geo
                            Joined:

                            Bring up the blacks in the second image because they're def under exposed. Don't know if you're shooting to RAW but I do most of my color tweaking in photoshop RAW.

                            +1 on working in RAW for colours - if you go JPEG initially you've already lost a lot of colour information

                            I use lightroom which has great features and works well inside pchop

                            Maybe you could try shooting B&W and look at 'colorising' elements - you can achieve some very unique results

                            Artificial Intelligence is no match for Natural Stupidity

                            last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • jbphoto23J
                              jbphoto23
                              Joined:

                              Lax. I would say forget the 24 and 50 and go with the 35 1.4…I have the 35 right now, and I used to have the 24 1.4.
                              the 24 is super wide, and with a crop body, the 50 is too tight. The 35 is an incredible lens. Just something to think about!

                              www.JoshBustosPhoto.com

                              last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • L
                                laxlife1234
                                Joined:

                                @Geo:

                                +1 on working in RAW for colours - if you go JPEG initially you've already lost a lot of colour information

                                I use lightroom which has great features and works well inside pchop

                                Maybe you could try shooting B&W and look at 'colorising' elements - you can achieve some very unique results

                                Yeah I have recently been shooting in RAW a ton of the time (I find I am liking it better). Makes editing the photos a lot easier and I find the results better. I would be using LR but I have CS5 and find it does everything I want, but the only thing is that I have found my windows computer to become a hell of a lot slower recently so I am going to probably need to upgrade to a mac for photo editing but I would rather spend that money on a new lens… decisions...decisions..

                                @jbphoto23:

                                Lax. I would say forget the 24 and 50 and go with the 35 1.4…I have the 35 right now, and I used to have the 24 1.4.
                                the 24 is super wide, and with a crop body, the 50 is too tight. The 35 is an incredible lens. Just something to think about!

                                You do make a good point… although, I think it would be more challenging and fun (imo) with a 24. I don't think I will be selling the 50 though as I would rather keep it so when I upgrade my body I have more lens to have fun with :)! If I do ever wind up going super-wide I will have to think very hard if it is worth it or not!

                                last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • jbphoto23J
                                  jbphoto23
                                  Joined:

                                  Unless you're shooting something you don't really care about having perfect, or high quality isn't important…like family pictures or something, you should always be shooting raw. If its really important to you, when you open the file in CS5 change the mode from 8 bit to 16 bit, it let's you go further with editing and you lose less quality and information. It does make your file larger but if you're working on a file a lot it helps. Jpegs are good when you're shooting large amounts of files you don't wanna edit too much, and for web files, that's about it.

                                  www.JoshBustosPhoto.com

                                  last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • L
                                    laxlife1234
                                    Joined:

                                    Forgot to reply to your comment! But, yeah high quality is important because when that day comes when I start printing my photos and they are amazing quality then I will be happy.

                                    last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • L
                                      laxlife1234
                                      Joined:

                                      last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • mvbM
                                        mvb
                                        Joined:

                                        hmm i dont want to know what you are burning there
                                        whilst enjoying some fine wine

                                        last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • injunjackI
                                          injunjack
                                          見習いボス
                                          Joined:

                                          mvb
                                          dirty minds think alike,,, maybe it's some sorta alien…..

                                          last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • Finn666F
                                            Finn666
                                            Joined:

                                            or some sort of "toy"…who knows 😃

                                            lax - i dont think thats "your" glass of vino, right? 😉
                                            great pic though mate.

                                            last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Copyright Iron Heart 2025.