The Flat Head

[madmonday]

true to size for the mad one, 36 waist.

ronbiggles, that is an awesome name.  now i am going to go home & look at the dave chapelle show, great jeans, thanks for sharing.

[Sugar Mountain]

Great 310s rongiggles. It's all about that 3xxx denim…  How long have you been wearing them?

[ronbiggles]

Thanks, they've had about 14 months wear, 2-3 machine washes, 2 handwashes and 1 in the sea..  I cycle a lot and got 'em good and muddy a few times.  Here's the worst they got (party in the woods):

[Giles]

That's officially dirty…...

[madmonday]

a cleaner pair:

[Sugar Mountain]

Holy shite, that's a lot of mud!

I've long wondered though - does this actually have any effect on evo once the jeans are washed?

[ronbiggles]

  I'm sure the mud takes more indigo with it when washed, but whether that is good as it means they fade faster, or bad as it means you get less contrast/low fade areas, I would say is all down to the beholder's eye, and the denim in question…  - silly sentence, can't be bothered to rewrite 

[Sugar Mountain]

Ha, no I understand. Cheers for the reply!

[madmonday]

i really do  love "the arcs" on these jeans

[Jordan23]

MM,

What ya say to this one?

[Jordan23]

http://shop.dc4.de/Men/Jeans/The-Flat-Head-3005-A-Natural-Indigo-Mix-Straight::832.html

[bagley920]

What justifies those to be worth almost $600?

[beautiful_FrEaK]

natural indigo is involved

[FOXY]

Nice one - like the cut and the denim.

Will try to post pictures later today.

–-
I am here: http://maps.google.com/maps?ll=55.753188,37.600986

[mvb]

So im thinking about getting some fh jeans, what model is a bit like ih634?

1005 and 3005?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Giles]

3009

[Jordan23]

As far as I know the 3009 is slightly tapered. Am I right G?

[Giles]

3009 is based on a 66 cut, as is the 634.  Both taper a little from the knee to the cuff…

[Jordan23]

Thx for teaching me!:)

[FOXY]

Just put them on top of each other…
3005 seems closer to 634 in the top block, knee and hem is straight cut but slightly wider than 634
3009 seems closer to 634 from thighs down, exact same width for knee and hem (but denim is not 21oz, will feel different), top block seems different in angle and back rise seems shorter

All in all, I would guess that 3005 should feel like the closer match (only slightly wider in the knee and hem), but 3009 should have the closer matching measurements.
(due to the variation between lots and sizes I can only make these assumptions based on my jeans: TFH 3005-A, IHT510/IH-634S, TR-010/TFH X009)