IH-1955S - 21oz Selvedge Denim "1955" Vintage Tapered Cut Jeans - Indigo

[AdamJ]

@Mister_Brue They've been done before, they're an exclusive to our good friend TJ at The Shop Vancouver!

[Mister_Brue]

@AdamJ Ah, of course. I thought you might have meant you were getting them in at IHUK. Good to know they’re on the way too though.

[Rococo]

@AdamJ Does this mean more slubby cuts on the way (634/66)?!

[Graham]

@Rococo

We have the slubby denim in production for all core cuts, bit too early in the process to have a rough time frame but rest assured that they are coming.

[Rococo]

@Graham thanks, mate

[Ile]

Is this an old size chart?

[Tago Mago]

@Ile the updated size chart can be found here or here. This appears to be an old chart.

[jebrand]

Thank you to whoever returned the 34's! Been regretting not picking these up.

[JoshC]

@jebrand They was on hold for a customer I had in yesterday trying them on, they looked great but they went for the 814-IND Wabash painters pants instead, I'm sure your gunna love them killer jeans the 1955.

[Go For Chill]

@jebrand Dang. Well played. I've been refreshing the site several times a day hoping someone would return a 34. You win this time! lol

[jebrand]

@Go-For-Chill Just got lucky, I happened to be checking my email when the restock notification came through!

[Go For Chill]

@jebrand Love that. It's the best feeling. Congrats!

[derek111]

First day in the 1955s. Pretty stoked on the fit. I sized down from the last pair of 1955 slubs I had, then eventually let go. So far the waist has stretched out perfectly.

[JoshC]

Looking spot on! @derek111

[derek111]

@JoshC thank you sir! Really digging them so far.

[ZackB]

@derek111 fit looks great man

[bonzo40]

I’m curious why the 1955 cut is not utilized more and with different fabrics. I admit I’m biased because they are the only IH cut that gives me enough room in the thighs and for the family jewels (6’1” 215lbs. athletic build). For anyone of similar build, I believe it’s the best fit and overall jean you can find.

With such high demand, why not increase and diversify your supply?

[Alex]

@bonzo40 we are, its been discussed a few times on here already. You'll also note that it is now part of the core cuts on the new webiste, a header in the shop menu, etc etc etc

[yannis]

Some of us do not like the higher rise. I am 6 foot 240 pounds athletic build also, and I like the 634 better. The combination of high rise and the bigger taper from knee to hem is not my thing. Different strokes for different folks.

[bonzo40]

Thanks for the replies! I am going to research the 634 a bit more I just thought the reduced rise would be an issue but maybe if I wear them lower or find the right measurements it would work. I do agree about the bottom taper as I wish the 1955 tapered just a bit more. You might have just changed my view on the 634 much appreciated.