We know you love IH, but where do you think we can improve?
-
@spitfiredealer I like your method too. Perhaps the overlay is overkill. Having consistency in the pictures and knowing the measurements would be the most helpful thing for me.
-
Overlay could work, but i think it would have to be something that is programmed into the website.
-
So it is almost like a roll over action @jebbriley
-
Agree that interactive Browser powered overlays would be overkill.
Just the photos of different cuts over the 634 should work. -
But what if you aren't interested in a 634 compared with another cut. What if you want to compare 666 & 777?
-
I've knocked something together that made sense to me. Although i realised as i got to the end that i forgot the 461 cut! KNOB! I'll add that tomorrow
But i'm hoping this is visually easy to understand. Also i'm planning on overlaying these so they can be compared easily. Thoughts and feelings? The grid is supposed to use the 634 cut as the guide… is that clear? I didn't do it with the length though because it just looked odd.
-
That's handy.
-
@Sam
I think it works better without legs in them as you have proved.as you can see from one I have done there is too much variation in the shots to really see clearly the difference in the cuts
now if you could stand exactly the same for each cut it might work better
-
Fabulous work y'all.
@Sam, that is exactly what I was imagining!
@spitfiredealer, thank you for putting that all together! It is definitely helpful to see them all together on the same person. Useful visual aide!
-
But what if you aren't interested in a 634 compared with another cut. What if you want to compare 666 & 777?
I see your point. I was thinking look at 634 vs 555 and then 634 vs 777 or whatever and try and figure it from there, but i was only thinking which were slimmer or more tapered. Now I see the image above I can see how much the top block is also a factor!
-
