Random questions to which you seek an answer
-
Slowly (ey)…
Haha!
Nate, I don't think you have to do anything special…..maybe put the country code (1) before the number. There can't be much to it.
-
Nope, you need to do +44 then the number without the leading zero….
So my mobile is 07740706464
You would text:
+44 7740706464
or 0044 7740706464So why do you brits have that leading 0 then? Otherwise it makes sense. Also, whats the logic on these country codes….never thought about it before.
-
Thomas,
I don't see how it's any different here in the States, you dial 1+ area code to dial anything that isn't local. Now add a country code, which they would need as well calling us, ours happens to be a extra 1. Do you see how the numbers then fall into place?
I never have to use a country code within the US. But, I have a feeling that is already built in, which is logical. I don't get the extra zeros that Giles mentioned
If you look online, not all countries use that prefix. Also, why is Uzbekistan 998, UK 44 and US, 1?
The question isn't important at all, but I couldn't extract the reasoning from wikipedia, so just wondering what the logic is.
-
Same for Belgium… My digits are 0485 XX XX XX, if you'd wanna text me it'd be 0032485 XX XX XX..
Nope, you need to do +44 then the number without the leading zero….
So my mobile is 07740706464
You would text:
+44 7740706464
or 0044 7740706464So why do you brits have that leading 0 then? Otherwise it makes sense. Also, whats the logic on these country codes….never thought about it before.
Virtually every country has a leading zero in their phone number.
Read this:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telephone_numbering_plan
and this:
-
And here is a "fascinating" read….
http://www.itu.int/dms_pub/itu-t/opb/sp/T-SP-E.164D-2009-PDF-E.pdf
-
I'm not sure there's a limit. I think Giles mentioned once that he has over five thousand.
-
Computer savy folk, my roommates and I seem to have lost the ability to access flickr.com from within my home network. Anyone have any idea what may be causing this? I've been puzzling through it and tried a few things, but to no avail…
-
^let's do cray cray internet trouble shoot'n
If you're a mac, open "terminal" (click magnifying glass). If PC, Start>Run>Cmd(then enter), If PC Win 8, hit Start type Cmd (then enter)
Mac (1 per line);
dig flickr.com
dig flickr.com @8.8.8.8
ping flickr.comPC (1 per line);
nslookup flickr.com
nslookup
server=8.8.8.8
flickr.com
quit
ping flickr.comThat should help resolve it. Flickr has shitty quality issues with it's ad server, my money is that..
-
These were the results of the digs, and the ping went along just fine…
; <<>> DiG 9.8.5-P1 <<>> flickr.com ;; global options: +cmd ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 35669 ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 13, ADDITIONAL: 0 ;; QUESTION SECTION: ;flickr.com. IN A ;; ANSWER SECTION: flickr.com. 92 IN A 98.139.240.139 ;; AUTHORITY SECTION: com. 51089 IN NS a.gtld-servers.net. com. 51089 IN NS b.gtld-servers.net. com. 51089 IN NS c.gtld-servers.net. com. 51089 IN NS d.gtld-servers.net. com. 51089 IN NS e.gtld-servers.net. com. 51089 IN NS f.gtld-servers.net. com. 51089 IN NS g.gtld-servers.net. com. 51089 IN NS h.gtld-servers.net. com. 51089 IN NS i.gtld-servers.net. com. 51089 IN NS j.gtld-servers.net. com. 51089 IN NS k.gtld-servers.net. com. 51089 IN NS l.gtld-servers.net. com. 51089 IN NS m.gtld-servers.net. ;; Query time: 4 msec ;; SERVER: 192.168.4.1#53(192.168.4.1) ;; WHEN: Tue Jan 28 10:55:51 EST 2014 ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 268 ; <<>> DiG 9.8.5-P1 <<>> flickr.com @8.8.8.8 ;; global options: +cmd ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 2242 ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0 ;; QUESTION SECTION: ;flickr.com. IN A ;; ANSWER SECTION: flickr.com. 410 IN A 98.139.240.139 ;; Query time: 170 msec ;; SERVER: 8.8.8.8#53(8.8.8.8) ;; WHEN: Tue Jan 28 10:55:51 EST 2014 ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 44
