• Home
    • Recent
    • Calendar
    • Register
    • Login
    Iron Heart Forum
    Iron Heart Forum

    Iron Heart Fall/Winter 2025 Collection Preview - Now Live

    IH-666S - The Devil's Fit Indigo - Slim Tapered

    Bottoms
    347
    2.9k
    1.2m
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • A
      alancwr
      Joined:


      IMG_20121117_142530 by alancwr, on Flickr


      IMG_20121117_160251 by alancwr, on Flickr

      http://photographyacw.blogspot.com

      last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • crankyfartC
        crankyfart
        Raw and Unwashed
        Joined:

        ^ great fit mate! prefer you in this than your beatle buster.  😛

        make peace, not war. <3

        last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • A
          alancwr
          Joined:

          yeah i prefer this fit, doesnt look so sloppy…

          http://photographyacw.blogspot.com

          last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • Dirty DenimD
            Dirty Denim
            Joined:

            Agreed!  These look great on u

            last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • crankyfartC
              crankyfart
              Raw and Unwashed
              Joined:

              @alancwr:

              yeah i prefer this fit, doesnt look so sloppy…

              agreed. sloppy is the word i was trying to describe but couldn't put my head to it. this makes you look neat/smart or whatever but i just prefer this look more than you in the beatle buster. 😉

              make peace, not war. <3

              last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • ?
                Guest
                Joined:

                G, would you say these fit bigger than FH 3009 in the same size?

                last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • ?
                  Guest
                  Joined:

                  Sorry I know you asked Giles, ill just tell you I have both. 3009, much fuller cut, esspesially the thighs. I had both in 34

                  last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • ?
                    Guest
                    Joined:

                    Any input is appreciated. Thanks.

                    How about the top block? Essentially I'm interested in knowing which pair has more give post soak. And I find that the size charts provided by Flat Head jeans are almost entirely off–it's ridiculous. (Pre soak measurement for 34s was 15.7 compared to the 35 advertised on, say, SE.)

                    last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • D
                      davito
                      Joined:

                      @Shoreman:

                      G, would you say these fit bigger than FH 3009 in the same size?

                      not G here PJ, FH3009 is therotically same cut as IH634, devils fit is slimmer. Have both like nerkg but do not wear the fh that much and they are in the Office for backup so not able to do a direct comparison right now. Overall the devils are superslim where 3009 are straight leg with bit of taper knee down.

                      Cheers,
                      David

                      last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • ?
                        Guest
                        Joined:

                        3009 don't give well. My 34 post soak was 31 3/4, after a month it hardly stretched at all, so I got a 36 soaked in near boiling water, waist is 33 1/2, a little relaxed fit but a welcome change..

                        last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • GilesG
                          Giles
                          IHUK Crew
                          Joined:

                          The 3009 is a 1966 cut, so similar to the 634S, the 666 is a slimmer cut.

                          "OK face up to it - you're useless but generally pretty honest and straightforward . . . it's a rare combination of qualities that I have come to admire in you" - Geo 2011

                          last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • ?
                            Guest
                            Joined:

                            Thanks, nerkg; that was more along the lines of what I was looking for. I was directing the question at G initially because I know that he, at times, carries Flat Head stock, so I was hoping I could get an idea of how both styles compare pre-soak. (i.e. if my 34 3009 has a pre-soak measurement of 15.7" in the waist, what does a 666s cut measure pre-soak–in reality, not just based on a universal chart--and is the denim more giving than the 3009 post soak.)

                            last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • GilesG
                              Giles
                              IHUK Crew
                              Joined:

                              the 666s will end up the same in the waist as per soak size

                              "OK face up to it - you're useless but generally pretty honest and straightforward . . . it's a rare combination of qualities that I have come to admire in you" - Geo 2011

                              last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • ?
                                Guest
                                Joined:

                                Nerkg, you wear a 36 in both?

                                last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • D
                                  davito
                                  Joined:

                                  From my experience and reading from other FH owners just be aware that you may get bit more shrinkage out in FH over time than in unsanforised IH when washed with agitation.

                                  For example I wear a 29 superslim in 666s and 30 in 3009. could easy wear a 30 still superslim in 666s and 3009 in 31. Freddy from VMC does it this way, we have almost the same built. But i like it sometimes even a bit slimmer than him.

                                  Cheers,
                                  David

                                  last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • ?
                                    Guest
                                    Joined:

                                    Thank you very much, Davito. That is a lot of help.

                                    last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • FergzF
                                      Fergz
                                      Raw and Unwashed
                                      Joined:

                                      @Shoreman:

                                      Thank you very much, Davito. That is a lot of help.

                                      Davito's a great guy - gave me some spot on advice when i was thinking about getting my own pair of 666s. I'm a tts 30 and opted for the same in the Devils. They fit me perfectly - struggled with that top button of course - but there's lots of stretch in them and a great slim fit.

                                      "Better to beg for forgiveness than ask for permission"

                                      last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • D
                                        davito
                                        Joined:

                                        Hi Shoreman you are very welcome, just take care of your thighs, which is most important imho. this is why I could size down to 29 in the devils as they stretched back quite fast in the waist to a 30.

                                        Hi Fergz thx a lot for your positive feedback, appreciate it very much and happy you are happy with your devils.

                                        Cheers,
                                        David

                                        last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • C
                                          CLJ
                                          Raw and Unwashed
                                          Joined:

                                          I'm sorry to ask this as I'm sure it has been asked before. Gave a look but 118 pages is a lot to digest.

                                          Tried a size 36 pair in the 666 today and to my surprise, could get them on. Knowing a soak is necessary, if I hot soak these while wearing them, will that be enough to bed the stitching and whatnot? I worry that a hot soak will shrink them to a point where I couldn't get them on again. The knee and below was good, as was the waist/top block. The thigh was the only area that was quite snug.

                                          Again, my apologies for not finding this info elsewhere…just a bit excited because I've wanted these badly.

                                          last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • scroogenS
                                            scroogen
                                            Joined:

                                            Cold soak should do you fine… if you're really concerned cold soak twice

                                            also I would say that if the thigh is too tight/uncomfortable now these don't fit you.

                                            last edited by 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Copyright Iron Heart 2025.