Random Announcements

[LandoCal126 0]

No 666?!? Guess he will be back for more next week…

[Giles]

Yeah, cheap skate…..

[thomasnunnally]

@Giles:

Yeah, cheap skate…..

lol.  Love to see newbies who buy more jeans right off the bat than I have acquired in the 18 months!

[Giles]

Thought you may be interested in this.  This is the number of forum posts on a plotted on a monthly basis since the forum started:

[LandoCal126 0]

@Giles:

Thought you may be interested in this.  This is the number of forum posts on a plotted on a monthly basis since the forum started:

Onwards and upwards!

[madmonday]

now the fun part is matching the fluctations & spikes with forum history.

interesting

[jacoavlu]

first spike was seul joining, followed by dip when lando went dark for several months

[rocket]

that make sense…

[jacoavlu]

second surge is the creation and growth of buying and selling section

[Seul]

Seul vs. B-Post… Seul wins...

B R U T A L I T Y…

Visualised, one of four bricks of custom forms equals this (yes: I'm set for a year…)

[thomasnunnally]

That last pic is awesome!

[Giles]

The first spike is when Geo, Seul and Nem (that is, Nem from the forum), were joshing big time…..

[Seul]

Good times… 

[thewickett]

was talking to my grandmother on the phone a few days ago. She was curious if I would be interested in my grandpa's 50s era USN peacoat. She added that he was usually stationed in warm climates so it rarely got worn.

I told her yes.

[Giles]

Wow, can't wait to see that thing….

[rocket]

would like to see some improvements to this…

sign up ladies...

[madmonday]

nah i like it all dudes.  behavior changes with too many women around.

plus that ratio is about equal to how many men it takes to equal one women 

[jacoavlu]

I would have guessed it was more like 400:1

[madmonday]

my wife & daughter would agree with you jaco

[Giles]

@jacoavlu:

I would have guessed it was more like 400:1

The stats are only as good as the info input.  Sex is not a required field, so the answer is only likely to be accurate by pure accident i.e. not