Thx - I'm in Canada - it is not a good time to be buying from the US...

Many thanks for the explanations - I managed to snag a pair of 1955s earlier today in my usual size, all my other IH jeans being 888s in 14, 18 and 21oz.

I have a growing collection of IH 888 jeans in size 36 (14oz, 18oz, 21oz). They are fantastically well made and a joy to wear.
They usually measure true to size - so very close to 36" in size 36 (17.6 - 18" across waist). These new 17oz natural indigo jeans measure small according to the chart - a size 36 is 34.8", so actually a size 35 not 36. And the next size up (38) measures at 37" - which is too big.
Have people found these 17oz jeans to fit snugger that your usual size in 888 or have you had to size up from your usual size?

Many thanks for the explanations - I managed to snag a pair of 1955s earlier today in my usual size, all my other IH jeans being 888s in 14, 18 and 21oz.

Wow - that drop disappeared quickly!

How does the 1955 cut compare to the 888. It looks like the 1955 has a higher rise but less tapered at the hem - or are they more similar?

Thx - I'm in Canada - it is not a good time to be buying from the US...

Wow - these shorts sold out very quickly - is there a restock in the pipeline?

Many thanks - glad to hear that it does not seem odd to tuck-in an IH work shirt - I've just never done it...

Though I always wear my Iron Heart Work Shirts untucked, I could imagine wearing this shirt under a blazer/sports jacket, in which case I would want to tuck it in. Does anyone wear Iron Heart Work Shirts tucked-in?

Does anyone wear this tucked-in - under a blazer/sports jacket?